Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 23 November 2023.

Core Citations

WORK EXPRESSION OF

• Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 23 November 2023.

This document cites

• Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales - Article 1
• Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm ve Ticaret AS v Minister for Transport, Energy and Communications and others.
• European Commission v Hungary.
• PJSC Rosneft Oil Company v Her Majesty's Treasury and Others.
• European Parliament v Council of the European Union.



See all quotations

• Advocaten voor de Wereld VZW v Leden van de Ministerraad.
• European Parliament v Council of the European Union.
• H v Council of the European Union, European Commission and European Union Police Mission (EUPM) in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
• Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU.
• Elitaliana SpA v Eulex Kosovo.
• Directive 2009/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 simplifying terms and conditions of transfers of defence-related products within the Community (Text with EEA relevance)
• Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine
• Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 of 17 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine
• Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union
• Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP of 17 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine
• Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice
• Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union 2016/C 202/01
• Tratado de la Unión Europea
• Council Decision  2014/512/CFSP of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine
• Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 6 octobre 2020.#Bank Refah Kargaran contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Pourvoi – Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune (PESC) – Article 29 TUE – Article 215 TFUE – Mesures restrictives prises à l’encontre de la République islamique d’Iran – Préjudice prétendument subi par la requérante à la suite de l’inscription et du maintien de son nom sur la liste des personnes et des entités auxquelles s’applique le gel de fonds et de ressources économiques – Recours en indemnité – Compétence de la Cour pour statuer sur la demande en réparation du préjudice prétendument subi en raison de mesures restrictives prévues par des décisions relevant de la PESC – Violation suffisamment caractérisée d’une règle de droit ayant pour objet de conférer des droits aux particuliers – Insuffisance de motivation d’actes instituant des mesures restrictives.#Affaire C-134/19 P.
• Treaty establishing the European Community
• MOON v. FRANCE
• S.C. FIERCOLECT IMPEX S.R.L. v. ROMANIA
• ISMAYILOV v. RUSSIA
• KARAPETYAN v. GEORGIA
• IMERI v. CROATIA
• VYSOČINA WIND a.s. v Česká republika, représentée par Ministerstvo životního prostředí.
• BPC Lux 2 Sàrl y otros contra Banco de Portugal y otros.
• Council Regulation (EU) 2023/1215 of 23 June 2023 amending Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine
• Council Regulation (EU) 2023/1214 of 23 June 2023 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine