Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 21 September 2023.

Core Citations

WORK EXPRESSION OF in

• Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 21 September 2023.

This document cites

• Aalborg Portland A/S (C-204/00 P), Irish Cement Ltd (C-205/00 P), Ciments français SA (C-211/00 P), Italcementi - Fabbriche Riunite Cemento SpA (C-213/00 P), Buzzi Unicem SpA (C-217/00 P) and Cementir - Cementerie del Tirreno SpA (C-219/00 P) v Commission of the European Communities.
• Deutsche Lufthansa AG v Flughafen Frankfurt-Hahn GmbH.
• República Francesa y Société commerciale des potasses et de l'azote (SCPA) y Entreprise minière et chimique (EMC) contra Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas.
• Masterfoods Ltd v HB Ice Cream Ltd.
• Vincenzo Manfredi v Lloyd Adriatico Assicurazioni SpA (C-295/04), Antonio Cannito v Fondiaria Sai SpA (C-296/04) and Nicolò Tricarico (C-297/04) and Pasqualina Murgolo (C-298/04) v Assitalia SpA.



See all quotations

• European Commission v Verhuizingen Coppens NV.
• Cogeco Communications Inc v Sport TV Portugal SA and Others.
• Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic.
• Cogeco Communications Inc contra Sport TV Portugal SA y otros.
• Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic.
• Compagnie française de l'azote (Cofaz) SA and others v Commission of the European Communities.
• Hoechst AG v Commission of the European Communities.
• Commission of the European Communities v BASF AG, Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV, DSM NV, DSM Kunststoffen BV, Hüls AG, Elf Atochem SA, Société Artésienne de Vinyle SA, Wacker Chemie GmbH, Enichem SpA, Hoechst AG, Imperial Chemical Industries plc, Shell International Chemical Company Ltd and Montedison SpA.
• Vantaan kaupunki v Skanska Industrial Solutions Oy and Others.
• European Commission v Alrosa Company Ltd.
• Holcim (Deutschland) AG v Commission of the European Communities.
• Courage Ltd v Bernard Crehan and Bernard Crehan v Courage Ltd and Others.
• Foto-Frost v Hauptzollamt Lübeck-Ost.
• Paola Faccini Dori v Recreb Srl.
• Dragoș Constantin Târșia v Statul român and Serviciul Public Comunitar Regim Permise de Conducere si Inmatriculare a Autovehiculelor.
• Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas contra Anic Partecipazioni SpA.
• Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (Text with EEA relevance)Text with EEA relevance
• Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union 2016/C 202/01
• Commission Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 of 7 April 2004 relating to the conduct of proceedings by the Commission pursuant to Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty (Text with EEA relevance)
• Tratado de la Unión Europea
• Directive 2014/104/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 November 2014 on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union Text with EEA relevance
• Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (Text with EEA relevance)
• VodafoneZiggo Group BV v European Commission.
• Instituto Madrileño de Investigación y Desarrollo Rural, Agrario y Alimentario contra JN.
• Sumal, S.L. v Mercedes Benz Trucks España, S.L.
• Conclusiones del Abogado General Sr. A. Rantos, presentadas el 28 de octubre de 2021.
• LM v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld and Österreichische Gesundheitskasse.
• Conclusiones de la Abogado General Sra. T. Ćapeta, presentadas el 7 de abril de 2022.
• Conclusions de l'avocat général M. M. Szpunar, présentées le 5 mai 2022.
• AB Volvo and DAF TRUCKS NV v RM.