Colonial Sugar Refining Company v Melbourne Harbour Trust Comrs

Core Citations

---

DISTINGUISHES

• Plimmer v Mayor of Wellington

REFERS TO

• Perry v Clissold
• Dundee Harbour Trustees v Dougall

CONSIDERS

• Governors of Magdalen Hospital v Knotts
• Leigh v Jack

CITES

• Mayor of Brighton v Guardians of Brighton
• Bobbett v South Eastern Railway Company
• Midland Railway Company v Wright

[See more]

• Mellor v Watkins
• Cornish v Stubbs
• Williams v Attorney-General (New South Wales)
• Turner v Walsh
• William Gann v The Free Fishers of Whitstable
• Attorney General v Johnson, The Mayor, Commonalty, and Citizens of London, and Earl Grosvenor
• Attorney General v Tomline
• Zacklynski v Polushie
• MacAllister v Bishop of Rochester
• Islington Vestry v Hornsey Urban Council
• 107 ER 1140
• Magdalen College Cambridge Case
• Attorney General for Ontario v Attorney General for the Dominion
• Perry v Eames.; Salaman v Eames.; Mercers' Company v Eames
• Nepean v Doe d Knight
• Re Wainewright. ex parte Slade
• Attorney General of the Straits Settlement v Wemyss
• Mellor v Walmesley

APPROVES

• Attorney General of Southern Nigeria v Holt (J.) & Company (Liverpool) ; Attorney General of Southern Nigeria v MacIver (W. B.) & Company

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 36 CLR 230

CITED in

• Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v State of Victoria (No 2)

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Colonial Sugar Refining Company v Melbourne Harbour Trust Comrs

REVERSED in

• Colonial Sugar Refining Company v Melbourne Harbour Trust Comrs

CONSIDERED in

• Lopinot Limestone Ltd v The Attorney General
• Gayadeen et Al v The Attorney General

This document cites

---

• 107 ER 1140
• Islington Vestry v Hornsey Urban Council
• Magdalen College Cambridge Case
• William Gann v The Free Fishers of Whitstable
• Attorney General v Johnson, The Mayor, Commonalty, and Citizens of London, and Earl Grosvenor



See all quotations

• Zacklynski v Polushie
• Attorney General of the Straits Settlement v Wemyss
• MacAllister v Bishop of Rochester
• Perry v Clissold
• Mayor of Brighton v Guardians of Brighton
• Nepean v Doe d Knight
• Midland Railway Company v Wright
• Mellor v Watkins
• Williams v Attorney-General (New South Wales)
• Re Wainewright. ex parte Slade
• Attorney General for Ontario v Attorney General for the Dominion
• Attorney General v Tomline
• Leigh v Jack
• Turner v Walsh
• Governors of Magdalen Hospital v Knotts
• Bobbett v South Eastern Railway Company
• Mellor v Walmesley
• Cornish v Stubbs
• Plimmer v Mayor of Wellington
• Dundee Harbour Trustees v Dougall
• Attorney General of Southern Nigeria v Holt (J.) & Company (Liverpool) ; Attorney General of Southern Nigeria v MacIver (W. B.) & Company
• Perry v Eames.; Salaman v Eames.; Mercers' Company v Eames