Coffey v Brunel Construction Company

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Devoy v Hanlon

CONSIDERS

• Registration of Title Act, 1964 - Articles : S-74
• Registration of Title Act, 1964 - Articles : S-51
• Registration of Title Act, 1964 - Articles : S-68

[See more]

• Registration of Title Act, 1964 - Articles : S-3
• Registration of Title Act, 1964 - Articles : S-52
• Registration of Title Act, 1964 - Articles : S-69
• Local Registration of Title (Ireland) Act 1891 - Articles : S-35
• Local Registration of Title (Ireland) Act 1891
• Tempany v Hynes
• Re Strong

REFERS TO

• Tempany v Hynes
• M'Gettigan v Roulstone
• Pim v Coyle

[See more]

• Rose v Watson

CITES

• McManus v Kiernan
• Joseph Murphy and Patrick M'Cormack
• Bull v Hutchens

[See more]

• Barry v Buckley
• Devoy v Hanlon

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 1983 WJSC-SC 119
• [1983] 5 JIC 1303
• [1983] IR 36 (Digest)

[See more]

• [1983] IR 36

REFERRED in

• Roche & Roche v Leacy
• Atlantis Developments Ltd ((in Receivership)) v Considine and Another

FOLLOWED in

• Moley v Fee

DISTINGUISHED in

• Gannon v Young

CONSIDERED in

• Goodbody Pensioneer Trustees Ltd v Hevac Ltd
• Industrial Credit Corporation Plc v Gleeson & Company Ltd
• Rosaleen Roohan v Eunan Gallagher as the Personal Representative of Andrew Roohan, Deceased

[See more]

• Paul Farrell v Everyday Finance Designated Activity Company, Ken Tyrell, Kieran Connolly, Rosemarie Connolly and the Property Registration Authority

This document cites

• Tempany v Hynes
• Barry v Buckley
• Tempany v Hynes
• Bull v Hutchens
• Re Strong



See all quotations

• Devoy v Hanlon
• Rose v Watson
• McManus v Kiernan
• Joseph Murphy and Patrick M'Cormack
• Devoy v Hanlon
• Local Registration of Title (Ireland) Act 1891
• M'Gettigan v Roulstone
• Pim v Coyle
• Registration of Title Act, 1964