Coca-Cola European Partners Deutschland GmbH contra L.B.

Core Citations

WORK EXPRESSION OF

• Coca-Cola European Partners Deutschland GmbH contra L.B.

This document cites

• Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v European Commission.
• Impact v Minister for Agriculture and Food and Others.
• Terveys- ja sosiaalialan neuvottelujärjestö (TSN) ry and Auto- ja Kuljetusalan Työntekijäliitto AKT ry v Hyvinvointialan liitto ry and Satamaoperaattorit ry.
• Sindicatul Familia Constanţa and Others v Direcţia Generală de Asistenţă Socială şi Protecţia Copilului Constanţa.
• Council Directive 93/104/EC of 23 November 1993 concerning certain aspects of the organization of working time



See all quotations

• Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union
• Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union 2016/C 202/01
• Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time
• Sportingbet PLC and Internet Opportunity Entertainment Ltd v Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Lisboa and Others.
• Treaty establishing the European Community
• D. J. v Radiotelevizija Slovenija.
• RJ v Stadt Offenbach am Main.
• F.C.I. contra Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS).
• Komisia za protivodeystvie na koruptsiyata i za otnemane na nezakonno pridobitoto imushtestvo v ZV and Others.
• Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 23 November 2021. Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2010/64/EU – Article 5 – Quality of the interpretation and translation – Directive 2012/13/EU – Right to information in criminal proceedings – Article 4(5) and Article 6(1) – Right to information about the accusation – Right to interpretation and translation – Directive 2016/343/EU – Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial – Article 48(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 267 TFEU – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Admissibility – Appeal in the interests of the law against a decision ordering a reference for a preliminary ruling – Disciplinary proceedings – Power of the higher court to declare the request for a preliminary ruling unlawful.#Case C-564/19.