Cobec Brazilian Trading and Warehousing Corporation v Alfred C. Toepfer

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Borrowman v Drayton
• Rosenthal & Sons Ltd v Esmail
• Pioneer Shipping Ltd v B.T.P. Tioxide Ltd (Nema)

[See more]

• Ballantine and Company v Cramp and Bosman
• Smyth (Ross T.) & Company Ltd v T. D. Bailey, Son & Company
• Kunstmesthandel (N.v) Voorheen L. Ten Cate and Others v Diamond Fertiliser and Chemical Company Ltd
• Reuter v Sala
• Bentsen v Taylor Sons & Company (No 2)

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Cobec Brazilian Trading and Warehousing Corporation v Alfred C. Toepfer

CONSIDERS

• Smyth (Ross T.) & Company Ltd v T. D. Bailey, Son & Company

CITES

• Rosenthal & Sons Ltd v Esmail
• Pioneer Shipping Ltd v B.T.P. Tioxide Ltd (Nema)

AFFIRMS

• Cobec Brazilian Trading and Warehousing Corporation v Alfred C. Toepfer

CONSIDERS

• Arbitration Act 1950
• Arbitration Act 1979
• Sale of Goods Act 1893

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1983] 2 Lloyd's Rep 386

CITED in

• Yukong Line Ltd of Korea v Rendsburg Investments Corporation of Liberia (The Rialto) (Preliminary Issues)

This document cites

• Pioneer Shipping Ltd v B.T.P. Tioxide Ltd (Nema)
• Rosenthal & Sons Ltd v Esmail
• Rosenthal & Sons Ltd v Esmail
• Reuter v Sala
• Smyth (Ross T.) & Company Ltd v T. D. Bailey, Son & Company



See all quotations

• Cobec Brazilian Trading and Warehousing Corporation v Alfred C. Toepfer
• Borrowman v Drayton
• Pioneer Shipping Ltd v B.T.P. Tioxide Ltd (Nema)
• Bentsen v Taylor Sons & Company (No 2)
• Smyth (Ross T.) & Company Ltd v T. D. Bailey, Son & Company
• Ballantine and Company v Cramp and Bosman
• Kunstmesthandel (N.v) Voorheen L. Ten Cate and Others v Diamond Fertiliser and Chemical Company Ltd
• Arbitration Act 1979
• Sale of Goods Act 1893
• Arbitration Act 1950