Cobar Corporation Ltd v Attorney-General (New South Wales)

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Doe dem. Murray, Lord Bishop of Rochester, against Bridges, 1831

CONSIDERS

• Partington v Attorney General
• Attorney General v Earl of Selborne

CITES

• Attorney General. v Sewell
• Maiden v Maiden
• Larios v Gurety

[See more]

• Barns against Hughs
• Anonymous (1794) 5 Mod 425
• Clarke v Bradlaugh
• Norwich Corporation v Norwich Electric Tramways Company
• Bell v Master in Equity of the Supreme Court of Victoria
• Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Maple & Company (Paris) Ltd
• Attorney General v The Corporation of London
• Taxation Commissioners v Mooney
• Richardson v Willis

APPLIES

• Attorney General v Bradbury & Evans

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 9 CLR 378

REFERRED in

• Commissioner of Stamps v Telegraph Investment Company Pty Ltd
• State Authorities Superannuation Board v Commissioner of State Taxation for Western Australia
• Low Huat Cheng and Another v Rozdenil bin Toni and another appeal

CONSIDERED in

• Moir [82479/2]
• Schipp v Cameron, Harrison and Others

CITED in

• Bull v Attorney-General (New South Wales)
• Schnelle v Dent

This document cites

• Barns against Hughs
• Anonymous (1794) 5 Mod 425
• Attorney General v Earl of Selborne
• Doe dem. Murray, Lord Bishop of Rochester, against Bridges, 1831
• Maiden v Maiden



See all quotations

• Bell v Master in Equity of the Supreme Court of Victoria
• Attorney General v Bradbury & Evans
• Richardson v Willis
• Larios v Gurety
• Taxation Commissioners v Mooney
• Attorney General. v Sewell
• Partington v Attorney General
• Clarke v Bradlaugh
• Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Maple & Company (Paris) Ltd
• Norwich Corporation v Norwich Electric Tramways Company
• Attorney General v The Corporation of London