Clayton v Clayton

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Pelling v Bruce-Williams (Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs intervening)

REFERRED in

• B County Council v Mr & Mrs R
• Practice Direction: Attendance of Media Representatives at Hearings in Family Proceedings
• Practice Direction: Attendance of Media Representatives at Hearings in Family Proceedings

[See more]

• Coventry City Council v X, Y and Z (care proceedings: costs: identification of local authority)
• Ltf v Lmf
• Re X (Children)
• Re Child X (Residence and Contact: Rights of Media Attendance: FPR Rule 10/284(4))
• President's Guidance in relation to Applications Consequent upon the Attendance of the Media in Family Proceedings
• Z County Council v TS, DS, ES and A
• Re Webster (A Child)
• N (A Child)

CITED in

• Practice Direction: Attendance of Media Representatives at Hearings in Family Proceedings (No 2)
• Re F (Children) (DNA Evidence)

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Clayton v Clayton

REVERSED in

• Clayton v Clayton

This document cites

• Pelling v Bruce-Williams (Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs intervening)