Clark v Chief Constable of Cleveland Police

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Mechanical and General Inventions Company and Lehwess v Austin and Austin Motor Company
• Sutcliffe v Pressdram Ltd
• Thompson v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis

[See more]

• John v MGN Ltd
• Johnston v Great Western Railway Company
• Lane v Holloway
• Scott v Musial
• Broome v Cassell & Company Ltd
• Rantzen v Mirror Group Newspapers and Others
• Blackshaw v Lord
• Ward v James
• Kiam v Neil (No 2)
• McCarey v Associated Newspapers Ltd (No. 2)
• Groom v Crocker

CONSIDERS

• Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 - Articles : S-8
• Public Order Act 1986 - Articles : S-4
• Police Act 1964 - Articles : S-51

This document cites

• Blackshaw v Lord
• John v MGN Ltd
• Lane v Holloway
• Scott v Musial
• McCarey v Associated Newspapers Ltd (No. 2)



See all quotations

• Ward v James
• Mechanical and General Inventions Company and Lehwess v Austin and Austin Motor Company
• Broome v Cassell & Company Ltd
• Groom v Crocker
• Groom v Crocker
• Kiam v Neil (No 2)
• Johnston v Great Western Railway Company
• Rantzen v Mirror Group Newspapers and Others
• Sutcliffe v Pressdram Ltd
• Thompson v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
• Police Act 1964
• Public Order Act 1986
• Courts and Legal Services Act 1990