Clarence Elloyd Sealy Appellant v The Queen Respondent

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• R v Michael Leonard Reardon Edgar Hernando Michaels Clifford Barry Taylor
• R v Weerdesteyn

[See more]

• R v Keenan
• R v Richard Norman Mearns
• Birchall v Bullough
• Romeo Da Costa Hall Appellant v The Queen Respondent
• [Court of Session—First Division.]
• R v Delaney
• Carr v R
• R v Francis
• [Court of Session—Second Division.]
• R v Sophear Em
• Benmax v Austin Motor Company Ltd
• Mckinney v R
• Stanoevski v R
• Kelly v R
• R v da Costa Hall
• Julian Oscar Francis Appellant v The Queen Respondent
• R v Forbes (Anthony Leroy)
• The Queen v Jane Sharon Mclaughlan

CONSIDERS

• Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
• Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 - Articles : S-60

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• (Summary)
• (Summary)
• [2017] 1 LRC 1

[See more]

• 88 WIR 70

CONSIDERED in

• Peter Barton v The Queen
• Vincent Leroy Edwards Richard Orlando Haynes v The Queen
• Jabari Sensimania Nervais v The Queen

[See more]

• Jabari Sensimania Nervais v The Queen

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 110 U.S. 574 (1884), Hopt v. People
• Massachusetts - 442 Mass. 423 (2004), SJC-09155, Commonwealth v. DiGiambattista
• Minnesota - 518 N.W.2d 587 (Minn. 1994), C4-93-1541, State v. Scales
• R v Weerdesteyn
• R v Michael Leonard Reardon Edgar Hernando Michaels Clifford Barry Taylor



See all quotations

• R v Richard Norman Mearns
• Benmax v Austin Motor Company Ltd
• The Queen v Jane Sharon Mclaughlan
• Stanoevski v R
• R v Delaney
• R v Forbes (Anthony Leroy)
• Kelly v R
• R v Keenan
• R v Sophear Em
• R v Francis
• Birchall v Bullough
• [Court of Session—First Division.]
• Carr v R
• Romeo Da Costa Hall Appellant v The Queen Respondent
• Mckinney v R
• Julian Oscar Francis Appellant v The Queen Respondent
• [Court of Session—Second Division.]
• R v da Costa Hall
• Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
• Benjamin and Ganga v The State