Chop Cheong Tuck of Ipoh, Re; ex parte Leong Cheong Wai, The Official Assignee of the Property of Chop Cheong Tuck v Leong Cheong Wai

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• Noyes v Crawley
• Knox v Gye

REFERS TO

• Banbury v Bank of Montreal
• Benaim & Company v Debono
• Dewdney, ex parte. Seaman, ex parte

[See more]

• Connecticut Fire Insurance Company v Kavanagh
• Johnson v Pickering
• Nagoremull v Triton Insurance Company, Ltd, and Others
• Spencer v Hemmerde
• Anonymous (1792) Cro Car 380
• Thursby against Warren

FOLLOWS

• Aronson v Liverpool Corporation
• Banbury v Bank of Montreal
• Bank of New South Wales v O'Connor

[See more]

• Benaim & Company v Debono
• Connectiout Fire Insurance v Cavenegh
• Re A Debtor
• Hawkings against Billhead
• Johnson v Pickering
• Nagoremull v Triton Insurance Company, Ltd, and Others
• Roch v Callen
• Spencer v Hemmerde
• Stile against Finch
• Thursby v Warren

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1938] FMSLR 19
• [1939] MLJ 185
• [1938] FMSLR 19

REFERRED in

• Smart Renovation Sdn Bhd v Jaireh Sdn Bhd; Smart Reader Worldwide Sdn Bhd

This document cites

• Spencer v Hemmerde
• Thursby v Warren
• Connectiout Fire Insurance v Cavenegh
• Johnson v Pickering
• Re A Debtor



See all quotations

• Hawkings against Billhead
• Noyes v Crawley
• Banbury v Bank of Montreal
• Anonymous (1792) Cro Car 380
• Thursby against Warren
• Johnson v Pickering
• Stile against Finch
• Knox v Gye
• Dewdney, ex parte. Seaman, ex parte
• Roch v Callen
• Banbury v Bank of Montreal
• Aronson v Liverpool Corporation