Chin v. Advanced Fresh Concepts Franchise Corp.

Core Citations

OVERRULES OTHER CASE

• Keating v. Superior Court

This document cites

• California - Sonic–calabasas a Inc. v. Moreno
• California - Bruni v. Didion
• California - Keating v. Superior Court
• California - Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.
• Federal Cases - Southland Corporation v. Keating



See all quotations

• California - Szetela v. Discover Bank
• California - Chern v. Bank of America
• California - Murphy v. Check `N Go of California, Inc.
• California - Walnut Producers of Cal. v. Diamond Foods, Inc.
• California - CABLE CONNECTION INC. v. DIRECTV INC.
• California - Iamco v. Superior Court
• California - Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare
• California - Postal Instant Press, Inc. v. Sealy
• California - Laupheimer v. State of California
• California - Dream Theater, Inc. v. Dream Theater
• California - Maggio v. Windward Capital Managment Co.
• California - Mercuro v. Superior Court
• California - Discover Bank v. Superior Court
• California - Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.
• California - Spahn v. Guild Industries Corp.
• California - Rosenthal v. Great Western Fin. Securities Corp.
• California - Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
• Federal Cases - Rent-A-Center, W., Inc. v. Jackson
• US - Reference Stubs - Disclosures by neutral arbitrators
• US - Reference Stubs - Untrue or misleading advertising
• US - Reference Stubs - Validity, irrevocability, and enforcement of agreements to arbitrate
• US - Reference Stubs - Short title
• US - Reference Stubs - Contract or clause unconscionable
• US - Reference Stubs - Unfair competition defined
• US - Reference Stubs - Generally
• US - Reference Stubs - Unlawful offer or sale of franchise
• US - Reference Stubs - Damages for actual loss or unjust enrichment
• US - Reference Stubs - Liablity for false or misleading statement
• US - Reference Stubs - "Maritime transactions" and "commerce" defined; exceptions to operation of title
• US - Reference Stubs - Grounds for not ordering parties to arbitrate controversy