Charles Lomax & Son Ltd (Plaintiffs) Hills Shopfitters Ltd (Defendants) C. & J. Clark Retail Ltd (Second Defendants to Counterclaim) Retail Planning and Design Services Ltd (trading as Robert Sutton Associates) (First Third Party) Herbert Wilkinson Rhodes (trading as H. W. Rhodes & Partners) (Second Third Party)
Linked as:
Extract
Charles Lomax & Son Ltd (Plaintiffs) Hills Shopfitters Ltd (Defendants) C. & J. Clark Retail Ltd (Second Defendants to Counterclaim) Retail Planning and Design Services Ltd (trading as Robert Sutton Associates) (First Third Party) Herbert Wilkinson Rhodes (trading as H. W. Rhodes & Partners) (Second Third Party)
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
- Drummond-Jackson v British Medical Association
- Nagle v Feilden
- Hubbuck & Sons Ltd v Wilkinson, Heywood & Clark Ltd
CONSIDERS
- Law Reform (Married Women and Tort-feasors) Act 1935 - Articles : S-6
