Chan Cheng Kum v Wah Tat Bank Ltd

Core Citations

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Chan Cheng Kum v Wah Tat Bank Ltd

REFERS TO

• Evans v Nichol
• Fraser v Evans
• Lickbarrow and Another against Mason and Others

[See more]

• Lockwood v Wood
• Bryans and Others v Nix
• Dublin City Distillery Ltd v Doherty
• Nippon Yusen Kaisha v Ramjiban Serowgee
• Official Assignee of Madras v Mercantile Bank of India Ltd
• Merchant Banking Company of London v Phoenix Bessemer Steel Company
• Hathesing v Laing; Laing v Zeden

FOLLOWS

• Baumvoll Manufactur von Scheibler v Gilchrest
• Brown against Wootton
• Goldrei, Foucard & Son v Sinclair

[See more]

• Harriman v Harriman
• Performing Right Society Ltd v Ciryl Theatrical Syndicate Ltd
• R v Hoare
• Wimpey (George) & Company Ltd v British Overseas Airways Corporation

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1971] SGPC 1
• [1969-1971] SLR 22

This document cites

• R v Hoare
• Fraser v Evans
• Harriman v Harriman
• Brown against Wootton
• Baumvoll Manufactur von Scheibler v Gilchrest



See all quotations

• Lickbarrow and Another against Mason and Others
• Lickbarrow and Another against Mason and Others
• Lockwood v Wood
• Hathesing v Laing; Laing v Zeden
• T. F. Evans and G. H. Evans v A. Nichol and J. L. Nichol and J. L. Nichol
• Wimpey (George) & Company Ltd v British Overseas Airways Corporation
• Official Assignee of Madras v Mercantile Bank of India Ltd
• Dublin City Distillery Ltd v Doherty
• Nippon Yusen Kaisha v Ramjiban Serowgee
• Bryans and Others v Nix
• The Odessa. The Woolston
• Goldrei, Foucard & Son v Sinclair
• Performing Right Society Ltd v Ciryl Theatrical Syndicate Ltd
• Evans v Nichol
• Merchant Banking Company of London v Phoenix Bessemer Steel Company