Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Herbert Smith & Company

Core Citations

DISAPPROVES

• Yeoman Credit Ltd v Latter
• Windsor Refrigerator Company Ltd v Branch Nominees Ltd

APPLIES

• Everett v Ribbands

CONSIDERED in

• Richard Ashworth and Others (Plaintiffs v Berkeley-Walbrook Ltd (by Original Action) (Defendants
• Blurton v Commonwealth Minister for Aboriginal Affairs
• Tony Francis Palmer v MacDonnell Shire Council [NTCA]

[See more]

• Beynon v Wongala Holdings
• Wereta v The Nominal Defendant
• Schoeller Australia Pty Ltd ((in Liquidation)) and Another v Garry Lissa and Others
• Idoport v NAB
• Matrix Film Investment One Pty Ltd and Others v Alameda Films LLC and Warner Bros Entertainment and Pictures Inc.
• Sheridan International Pty Ltd and Others v C.S. Brooks Inc.
• James A L Peniston trading as East Bank Consultants v Gaythorne Mark Gibbons
• Sanitary Laundry Company Ltd v Chase Manhattan Bank
• The Performing Rights Society Ltd v Galleria Cinemas Ltd
• Warner Bros. Inc. and Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation v Robsutt Ltd (Trading as Xanadu Beach Hotel)
• Church of Scientology of California (Plaintiffs) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
• Ferrari v Issa et Al
• The National Commercial Bank of Trinidad and Tobago Ltd v Mahara
• Maurice Arnold Tomlinson v Attorney General of Jamaica
• Paul Pretlove (in His Capacity as Sole Liquidator) v Koshigi Ltd and Dmitry Kostygin
• Bartlett v Kirton
• Paul Pretlove (in his capacity as sole liquidator) v Koshigi Ltd

REFERRED in

• Soufflet Beheer v Awb Ltd
• Aird (John) v Esso Standard Oil SA Ltd
• Kumarasamy and Others v Revathy Development (M) Sdn Bhd

[See more]

• Chan Tuck Seng v Chan Lee
• Ah San @ Goh Ah Soon v Majlis Bandaraya Ipoh
• Dato' Hj Talaat bin Hj Hussain v Chak Kong Yin
• Krishnan Rajan N Krishnan v Bank Negara Malaysia and Others
• Anne Lim Keng See v The New Straits Times Press (M) Bhd
• Federal Insurance Co v Nakano Singapore (Pte) Ltd
• State Bank of India v Sood

APPLIED in

• Hampshire County Council v Shonleigh Nominees Ltd
• C Corporation v P

FOLLOWED in

• Kumarasamy and Others v Revathy Development (M) Sdn Bhd
• Huang Ee Hoe and Another v Tiong Thai King and Others
• Jet-Age Construction Sdn Bhd v Module Construction Sdn Bhd, HC

CITED in

• Jackson Lalic Lawyers Pty Ltd v Gregory Ian Attwells

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1968] 2 All ER 1002
• [1969] 1 CH 93
• [1968] 3 WLR 281

This document cites

• Yeoman Credit Ltd v Latter
• Everett v Ribbands
• Windsor Refrigerator Company Ltd v Branch Nominees Ltd
• Rules of the Supreme Court (Revision) 1965