Capital Telephone Co., Inc. v. Pattersonville Telephone Co., Inc.

Core Citations

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Capital Telephone Co., Inc. v. Pattersonville Telephone Co., Inc.

SUPERSEDES

• Capital Telephone Co., Inc. v. Pattersonville Telephone Co., Inc.

This document cites

• New York - Hewitt v. New York, N.H.&H.R. Co.
• New York - Gilberg v. Barbieri
• New York - State v. McBride Transp., Inc.
• Federal Cases - United States v. Western Pacific Railroad Company
• Federal Cases - Tipler v. EI DuPont deNemours and Co.



See all quotations

• New York - Columbia Gas of New York, Inc. v. New York State Elec. & Gas Corp.
• New York - B. R. DeWitt, Inc. v. Hall
• New York - Van Dussen-Storto Motor Inn, Inc. v. Rochester Tel. Corp.
• New York - Bernstein v. Birch Wathen School
• New York - Van Dussen-Storto Motor Inn, Inc. v. Rochester Tel. Corp.
• Federal Cases - United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
• New York - People ex rel. Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. New York Tel. Co.
• New York - Van Dussen-Storto Motor Inn, Inc. v. Rochester Telephone Corp.
• Federal Cases - Nasem v. Brown
• New York - Westchester Mobilfone System, Inc. v. Public Service Commission
• New York - State v. Mobil Oil Corp.
• Federal Cases - United States v. American Tel. & Tel. Co.
• Federal Cases - Northeastern Telephone Co. v. American Tel. & Tel. Co.
• Federal Cases - United States v. Utah Construction and Mining Co
• Federal Cases - Federal Maritime Board v. Isbrandtsen Company and Gulf Freight Conference v. United States
• Federal Cases - United States v. Philadelphia National Bank
• Federal Cases - Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc
• Federal Cases - Far East Conference v. United States
• New York - Capital Telephone Co., Inc. v. Pattersonville Telephone Co., Inc.
• New York - Schwartz v. Public Adm'r of Bronx County
• New York - American Ins. Co. v. Messinger
• Federal Cases - Cantor v. Detroit Edison Company
• US - Reference Stubs - Contracts or agreements for monopoly or in restraint of trade illegal and void
• US - Reference Stubs - Adequate service; just and reasonable charges; unjust discrimination; unreasonable preference; protection of privacy