Capital and Suburban Properties Ltd v Swycher

Core Citations

---

DOUBTS

• Watson v Cox
• Sweet v Meredith

REFERS TO

• Griffiths v Vezey
• Hall v Burnell
• Austins of East Ham Ltd v Macey

APPROVES

• Barber v Wolfe
• Henty v Schröder

CONSIDERS

• General Rate Act 1967 - Articles : S-17

CITED in

• A.M.A.A. v Minister for Justice
• Ten Leu Jiun Jeanne-Marie v The National University of Singapore

DISTINGUISHED in

• Biggin v Minton

CONSIDERED in

• David Anthony Perkins v Senior Constable Steven George Bills
• International FinanceTrust Company Ltd and Another v New South Wales Crime Commission
• Salvatore Di Benedetto (in his personal capacity and as executor and trustee of the will and estate of Luigi Di Benedetto) v Kilton Grange Pty Ltd (First Respondent)

[See more]

• Director General, New South Wales Department of Community Services v Childrens Court of New South Wales and Others; Re Peter and Others
• Morrow v Tucker [No 2]
• Pedros (Peter) Angelos Kypreos v Nabalco Pty Ltd
• Monsanto Plc v 1. Rowan Tilly and Others
• Despot v Registrar General of New South Wales
• Monsanto Plc v 1. Rowan Tilly and Others
• Mk (Duty to Give Reasons)
• Wong v Van Vlymen
• Howell v Weston
• R v Harrow Crown Court, ex parte Dave
• Murphy v Quality Homes

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1977] 1 EGLR 141
• [1976] 1 All ER 881
• [1976] CH 319

[See more]

• [1976] 2 WLR 822

REFERRED in

• Singh (Sudagar) v Nazeer
• Thong Ah Fat v PP
• Buckland v Farmar & Moody

FOLLOWED in

• Johnson v Agnew

This document cites

---

• Austins of East Ham Ltd v Macey
• Barber v Wolfe
• Griffiths v Vezey
• Watson v Cox
• Hall v Burnell



See all quotations

• Sweet v Meredith
• Henty v Schröder
• General Rate Act 1967