Canberra Wall Frames v White

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• Mclean v Tedman

REFERS TO

• Armstrong & De Mamiel Constructions Pty Ltd v Virenius
• Buckman (Hc) & Son Pty Ltd v Flanagan

CITES

• General Constructions Pty Ltd v Peterson
• Sungravure Pty Ltd v Meani
• Commissioner for Railways (Q) v Ruprecht

APPLIES

• Podrebersek v Australianiron and Steel Pty Ltd
• Wynbergen v Hoyts Corporation Pty Ltd

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1999] FCA 1810
• 94 FCR 137
• 168 ALR 667

CONSIDERED in

• Angelo Stojkoski v Belconnen Concrete Pty Ltd (Acn 008 555 360)
• Artur Fatur v IC Formwork Services Pty Ltd

This document cites

• Armstrong & De Mamiel Constructions Pty Ltd v Virenius
• Commissioner for Railways (Q) v Ruprecht
• Mclean v Tedman
• Podrebersek v Australianiron and Steel Pty Ltd
• Wynbergen v Hoyts Corporation Pty Ltd



See all quotations

• General Constructions Pty Ltd v Peterson
• Sungravure Pty Ltd v Meani
• Buckman (Hc) & Son Pty Ltd v Flanagan