Extract
Canadian contractual duress and criminal duress: "irrational, anomalous, perverse, illogical and fundamentally wrong" or just misunderstood?
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
This document cites
-
R. v. Daviault (H.), (1994) 173 N.R. 1 (SCC)
-
R. v. Ruzic (M.), 2001 SCC 24
-
R. v. Lavallee, (1990) 108 N.R. 321 (SCC)
-
R. v. Cinous (J.), (2002) 285 N.R. 1 (SCC)
-
Rodriguez v. British Columbia (Attorney General) et al., (1993) 158 N.R. 1 (SCC)
See all quotations
-
R. v. Paquette, (1976) 11 N.R. 451 (SCC)
-
R. v. Ryan (N.P.), (2011) 301 N.S.R.(2d) 255 (CA)
-
R. v. Osolin, (1993) 162 N.R. 1 (SCC)
-
R. v. Perka, Nelson, Hines and Johnson, (1984) 55 N.R. 1 (SCC)
-
R. v. Squire, (1976) 10 N.R. 25 (SCC)
-
R. v. Stone (B.T.), (1999) 239 N.R. 201 (SCC)
-
R. v. Hibbert (L.), (1995) 184 N.R. 165 (SCC)
-
Royal Boskalis Westminster N.v v Mountain
-
Universe Tankships Inc. of Monrovia v International Transport Workers Federation (Marine)
-
DPP for Northern Ireland v Lynch
-
R v Howe; R v Bannister; R v Burke; R v Clarkson
-
R v Gotts
-
R v Hasan (Aytach)
-
R v Gill
-
Kaufman v Gerson
-
Malik and Abbott v The Queen
-
North Ocean Shipping Company Ltd v Hyundai Construction Company Ltd
-
Barton v Armstrong
-
Pao on v Lau Yiu Long
-
R v Attorney General of England and Wales
-
Huyton S.A. v Peter Cremer G.m.b.H. & Company
-
New York - Austin Instrument, Inc. v. Loral Corp.
-
Federal Cases - Hill v. Mitchell
-
Washington - State v. Riker
-
New Jersey - State v. Romano
-
California - Leeper v. Beltrami
-
Federal Cases - Martin v. Ohio
-
New Jersey - Rubenstein v. Rubenstein
-
Alabama - Arp v. State
-
Massachusetts - Fairbanks v. Snow
