Cadle Company, The v Hearley

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Limitation Act 1980 - Articles : S-29
• Richardson v Quercus Ltd

DISTINGUISHES

• Re Daintrey. ex parte Holt

REFERS TO

• Hawick Jersey International Ltd v Caplan
• Bell v Lothiansure Ltd ((in Liquidation)) and Another and 57 other conjoined causes
• Muller v Linsley & Mortimer

[See more]

• Buckinghamshire County Council v Moran
• Re Flynn, deceased (No 2)
• Rush & Tompkins Ltd v Greater London Council
• South Shropshire District Council v Amos
• Surrendra Overseas Ltd v Government of Sri Lanka
• Tomlin v Standard Telephones & Cables Ltd

CITES

• Daks Simpson Group Plc v Kuiper

APPLIES

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2002] 1 Lloyd's Rep 143

CONSIDERED in

• Rwe Npower Plc v Alstom Power Ltd

REFERRED in

• Kim Eng Securities Pte Ltd v Tan Suan Khee

CITED in

• Bradford & Bingley Plc v Rashid

This document cites

• South Shropshire District Council v Amos
• Rush & Tompkins Ltd v Greater London Council
• Buckinghamshire County Council v Moran
• Richardson v Quercus Ltd
• Bell v Lothiansure Ltd ((in Liquidation)) and Another and 57 other conjoined causes



See all quotations

• Hawick Jersey International Ltd v Caplan
• Tomlin v Standard Telephones & Cables Ltd
• Muller v Linsley & Mortimer
• Re Flynn, deceased (No 2)
• Re Daintrey. ex parte Holt
• Surrendra Overseas Ltd v Government of Sri Lanka
• Daks Simpson Group Plc v Kuiper