Cadam v Beaverbrook Newspapers Ltd

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Hubbuck & Sons Ltd v Wilkinson, Heywood & Clark Ltd
• Sir W. De Crespigny v Wellesley

CONSIDERS

• Hennessy v Wright (No. 3)

APPLIES

• Kemsley v Foot

CONSIDERED in

• Mark Shirley Portal Litchfield v Times Newspapers Ltd
• Waterhouse v Perkins
• Harkianakis v Skalkos and Others

[See more]

• Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd
• Tim Barr Pty Ltd and Another v Narui Gold Coast Pty Ltd
• Ainsworth v Burden
• Ainsworth v Burden
• Cristiano Ronaldo v Telegraph Media Group Ltd
• EC Karl Blythe v Gleaner Company Ltd
• Brewster v Bridgemohan Et. Al
• Abrahams v The Gleaner Company Ltd et Al
• Harvey v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd
• Cruise and Another v Express Newspapers Plc and Another
• Irfan Qadir v Associated Newspapers Ltd

REFERRED in

• A-G, Malaysia; Karpal Singh
• London Computer Operators Training Ltd v British Broadcasting Corporation
• Ng Koo Kay Benedict v Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd

[See more]

• Williams v Reason (Note)
• Black, Kenneth v The Right Hon Mr Edward Seaga
• Dingle v Associated Newspapers Ltd
• Goh Chok Tong v Jeyaretnam Joshua Benjamin

FOLLOWED in

• A-G, Malaysia; Karpal Singh

DISTINGUISHED in

• Abdul Ghapur Hj Salleh, Datuk v Ch'ng Boon Heng, the Chief Editor of New Sabah Times & 2 Ors
• Patrick Hodgins v Squire Sanders LLP
• Stern v Piper

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1959] 1 All ER 453
• [1959] 1 QB 413
• [1959] 2 WLR 324

APPLIED in

• Lewis v Daily Telegraph Ltd; Rubber Improvement Ltd v Daily Telegraph Ltd; Rubber Improvement Ltd v Associated Newspapers Ltd
• Waters v Sunday Pictorial Newspapers Ltd

This document cites

• Kemsley v Foot
• Hennessy v Wright (No. 3)
• Hubbuck & Sons Ltd v Wilkinson, Heywood & Clark Ltd
• Sir W. De Crespigny v Wellesley