Burke v Burke

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• Rawlings v Rawlings

CONSIDERS

• Trustee Act 1925 - Articles : S-36
• Married Women's Property Act 1882 - Articles : S-17
• Law of Property Act 1925

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1974] 2 All ER 944
• [1974] 1 WLR 1063

APPLIED in

• Re Bailey (A Bankrupt) (No. 25 of 1975)
• Re Holliday (A Bankrupt)ex parte Trustee of the Property of the Bankrupt v Holliday

CONSIDERED in

• The Law of Property Act, 1925 and Others (Applicant) (Respondent) The Bankrupt (First Respondent) (Respondent) Sally Barbara Elaine Holliday (Second Respondent) (Appellant)
• Bankers Trust Company Amir Arsalan Roumi Namdar and Others Amir Arsalan Roumi Namda and Another
• Re Evers' Trust

REFERRED in

• Re Citro (Domenico) (a Bankrupt); Re Citro (Carmine) (a Bankrupt)

DISTINGUISHED in

• Williams (J. W.) v Williams (M. A.)

This document cites

• Rawlings v Rawlings
• Law of Property Act 1925
• Married Women's Property Act 1882