Extract
BS v Ayers-Caesar and Attorney General; SS v Ayers-caesar et Al
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
CONSIDERS
This document cites
-
Federal Cases - 543 U.S. 551 (2005), 03-633, Roper v. Simmons
-
Black-Clawson International Ltd v Papierwerke Waldhof-Aschaffenburg A.G.
-
R v Secretary of State for Health ex parte Quintavalle (on behalf of Pro-Life Alliance)
-
Ballard (Kent) Ltd v Oliver Ashworth (Holdings) Ltd
-
Fothergill v Monarch Airlines Ltd
See all quotations
-
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union
-
Re W. (A Minor) (Wardship: Jurisdiction)
-
London & Clydeside Estates Ltd v Aberdeen District Council
-
Tower Hamlets London Borough Council v Rahanara Begum
-
Quinland v Governor of HM Prison Swaleside and Others
-
McCormick v Horsepower Ltd
-
Jagprit Randhawa v The Crown
-
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte T.; R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte H.; R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Hickey
-
Belize Alliance of Conservation Non-Governmental Organisations v Department of the Environment of Belize and another
-
Matthew v Trinidad and Tobago
-
Rees v Crane
-
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
-
Maya Leaders Alliance and Others v Attorney General of Belize and another
-
Peters (Winston) v Attorney-General and Another, Chaitan (William) v Attorney-General and Another
-
Minister of State for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh
-
Ong Ah Chuan v Public Prosecutor
-
Seepersand v Persad and another (Trinidad and Tobago)
-
Neville Lewis and Others v Attorney General of Jamaica and Another
-
James v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
-
Ramesh Lawrence Maharaj v Attorney-General of Trinidad and Tobago (No 2)
-
Panday v Gordon
-
Naidike and Others v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
-
Wang v Commissioner of Inland Revenue
-
Jaroo v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
-
Inniss v Attorney General of Saint Christopher & Nevis (Saint Christopher & Nevis)
-
Surratt v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
-
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte T.; R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte H.; R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Hickey
-
James v Attorney General
-
Barbados Rediffusion Services Ltd Appellant v Asha Mirchandani Ram Mirchandani McDonald Farms Ltd Respondents
-
Suratt and Others v Attorney General (No 2)