British Telecommunications Plc (Respondent) Office of Communications (Appellant) Hutchison 3G UK Ltd ("Three") (Intervener)

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Re A (A Child) and M (A Child)
• R (Hope & Glory Public House Ltd) v City of Westminster Magistrates Court

REFERS TO

• R (Hope & Glory Public House Ltd) v City of Westminster Magistrates Court
• NAPP Pharmaceutical Holdings Ltd v Director-General of Fair Trading

CONSIDERS

• Ladd v Marshall
• T-Mobile (UK) Ltd and Others v Office of Communications
• Communications Act 2003 - Articles : S-192

[See more]

• Communications Act 2003 - Articles : S-185
• Wireless Telegraphy Act 2006
• Competition Act 1998
• Enterprise Act 2002
• Licensing Act 2003

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2011] 4 All ER 372

CONSIDERED in

• Competition and Markets Authority v Flynn Pharma Ltd
• British Telecommunications Plc v Telefónica O2 UK Ltd and Others

REFERRED in

• Vodafone Ireland Ltd v Commission for Communications Regulation

This document cites

• R (Hope & Glory Public House Ltd) v City of Westminster Magistrates Court
• R (Hope & Glory Public House Ltd) v City of Westminster Magistrates Court
• NAPP Pharmaceutical Holdings Ltd v Director-General of Fair Trading
• Re A (A Child) and M (A Child)
• T-Mobile (UK) Ltd and Others v Office of Communications



See all quotations

• Ladd v Marshall
• Licensing Act 2003
• Wireless Telegraphy Act 2006
• Communications Act 2003
• Competition Act 1998
• Enterprise Act 2002
• Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive)