BP Plc (formerly known as BP AMOCO Plc) v Woolworths Ltd

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Patents, Designs, and Trade Marks Act 1883 - Articles : S-67
• Trade Marks Registration Act 1875

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• Nikken Wellness Pty Ltd v Van Voorst

DOUBTS

• Winton Shire Council v Lomas

CITES

• Registrar of Trade Marks v Muller
• Re Smith Kline & French Laboratories Ltd's Applications
• Re Reddaway (F.) & Company 's Application

COMMENTS

• Re W. & G. Du Cros Ltd's Applications

APPLIES

• Burger King Corporation v Registrar of Trade Marks
• Clark Equipment Company v Registrar of Trade Marks
• Re Leopold Cassella & Company Gesellschaft M.B.H.

FOLLOWS

• Levi Strauss & Company v Kimbyr Investments
• Blount Inc. v Registrar of Trade Marks

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2004] FCA 1362
• 212 ALR 79

REVERSED in

• Woolworths Ltd v Bp Plc

This document cites

• Re Smith Kline & French Laboratories Ltd's Applications
• Re Reddaway (F.) & Company 's Application
• Blount Inc. v Registrar of Trade Marks
• Nikken Wellness Pty Ltd v Van Voorst
• Winton Shire Council v Lomas



See all quotations

• Re Leopold Cassella & Company Gesellschaft M.B.H.
• Registrar of Trade Marks v Muller
• Clark Equipment Company v Registrar of Trade Marks
• Burger King Corporation v Registrar of Trade Marks
• Re W. & G. Du Cros Ltd's Applications