Tops, bottoms, and versatiles: what straight views of penetrative preferences could mean for sexuality claims under Price Waterhouse.
›
Linked as:Summary
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Extract
Tops, bottoms, and versatiles: what straight views of penetrative preferences could mean for sexuality claims under Price Waterhouse.
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
This document cites
- Federal Cases - 232 F.3d 33 (2nd Cir. 2000), 99-6180, Simonton v Runyon
- Federal Cases - 398 F.3d 211 (2nd Cir. 2005), 03-7180, Dawson v. Bumble & Bumble
- Federal Cases - 332 F.3d 1058 (7th Cir. 2003), 02-2529, Hamm v. Weyauwega Milk Products, Inc.
- Federal Cases - 579 F.3d 285 (3rd Cir. 2009), 07-3997, Prowel v. Wise Business Forms, Inc.
- Federal Cases - 453 F.3d 757 (6th Cir. 2006), 04-3776, Vickers v. Fairfield Medical Center
