Bongrain SA's Trade Mark Application (No.2134604)

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Re Merz & Krell GmbH & Company
• Kabushiki Kaisha Yakult Honsha's Trade Mark Application (Nos.1260017 and 1560018)

REFERS TO

• Biogen Inc. v Medeva Plc

RESUELVE RECURSO

• R (MH) v Secretary of State for Health

AFFIRMS

• Bongrain SA's Trade Mark Application (No.2134604)
• R (MH) v Secretary of State for Health

CONSIDERS

• Trade Marks Act 1994

CONSIDERED in

• Betafence Ltd v The Registrar of Trademarks
• Vibe Technologies Ltd's Application No 2390030
• The London Taxi Corporation Ltd trading as The London Taxi Company v Frazer-Nash Research Ltd and Another

[See more]

• Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Cadbury UK Ltd
• The London Taxi Corporation Ltd trading as the London Taxi Company v Frazer-Nash Research Ltd and Another

CITED in

• O2 Holdings Ltd's Trade Mark Application

REFERRED in

• Carabott v Huxley
• Nation Fittings (M) Sdn Bhd v Oystertec Plc and Another Suit
• Whirlpool Corporation and Others v Kenwood Ltd

[See more]

• The London Taxi Corporation Ltd trading as the London Taxi Company v Frazer-Nash Research Ltd and Another
• Société Des Produits Nestlé SA v Cadbury UK Ltd

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 03/12/2004 Daily Cases
• 2005 RPC 14
• [2005] ETMR 47

[See more]

• [08/12/2004] TLR 1

This document cites

• Biogen Inc. v Medeva Plc
• Bongrain SA's Trade Mark Application (No.2134604)
• R (N) v M
• Kabushiki Kaisha Yakult Honsha's Trade Mark Application (Nos.1260017 and 1560018)
• Biogen Inc. v Medeva Plc



See all quotations

• Re Merz & Krell GmbH & Company
• R (MH) v Secretary of State for Health
• Mental Health Act 1983
• Trade Marks Act 1994
• Koninklijke KPN Nederland NV v Benelux-Merkenbureau.
• Nestlé Waters France v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Henkel KGaA.
• Mag Instrument Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).
• Libertel Groep BV v Benelux-Merkenbureau.
• Henkel KGaA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Henkel KGaA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Merz & Krell GmbH & Co..
• Gut Springenheide GmbH y Rudolf Tusky contra Oberkreisdirektor des Kreises Steinfurt - Amt für Lebensmittelüberwachung.
• Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) v Erpo Möbelwerk GmbH.
• Human Rights Act 1998