Blakely, Apprendi, Booker, Begay, and Santos: judicial minimalism and the U.S. Supreme Court's ill-conceived attempts at a rational jurisprudence.
›
Linked as:Extract
Blakely, Apprendi, Booker, Begay, and Santos: judicial minimalism and the U.S. Supreme Court's ill-conceived attempts at a rational jurisprudence.
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
This document cites
- Federal Cases - 325 F.Supp.2d 373 (S.D.N.Y. 2004), 04 CR.97, United States v. Einstman
- Federal Cases - 335 F.Supp.2d 268 (D.Conn. 2004), 3 02CR362, United States v. Toro
- Federal Cases - 573 F.Supp.2d 744 (E.D.N.Y. 2008), 05-CR-636 FB S-2, United States v. Parris
- Federal Cases - 559 F.3d 1188 (11th Cir. 2009), 07-13701, Hunter v. United States
- Federal Cases - 512 F.3d 819 (6th Cir. 2008), 06-2259, United States v. Sedore
