Bilkus v Stockler Brunton (A Firm)

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• O'Neill v Phillips
• Bennett v Ewens

REFERS TO

• Re Thompson
• Sadd v Griffin
• Re Catlin

[See more]

• Polak v Marchioness of Winchester
• C v C (Costs: Non-Contentious Business)
• Mark Anthony O'Neill and Another (Petitioners/Appellants) v Michael Phillips and Others

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Bilkus v Stockler Brunton (A Firm)

AFFIRMS

• Bilkus v Stockler Brunton (A Firm)

CONSIDERS

• Companies Act 1985 - Articles : S-459
• Solicitors Act 1974 - Articles : S-60
• Solicitors Act 1974

[See more]

• Solicitors Act 1974 - Articles : S-57
• Solicitors Act 1974 - Articles : S-70
• Solicitors Act 1843
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2010] NULL EGCS 104
• [2010] NULL EGCS 104
• [2010] WLR D 43

[See more]

• [2010] 3 All ER 64
• [2010] NULL EGCS 104
• [08/04/2010] TLR 2
• [2010] 1 WLR 2526

CITED in

• Tel-Ka Ltd v Revenue andCustoms Commissioners (Law Society intervening)

REFERRED in

• Parvez v Mooney Everett Solicitors Ltd
• Sylvia Olukoya v Riverbrooke Solicitors Ltd

CONSIDERED in

• David Rees and Another v Gateley Wareing (A Firm)and Another
• Sylvia Olukoya v Riverbrooke Solicitors Ltd

This document cites

• O'Neill v Phillips
• Polak v Marchioness of Winchester
• Bilkus v Stockler Brunton (A Firm)
• Re Catlin
• Bennett v Ewens



See all quotations

• Sadd v Griffin
• C v C (Costs: Non-Contentious Business)
• Re Thompson
• Solicitors Act 1974
• Solicitors Act 1843
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973
• Companies Act 1985
• Solicitors' (Non-Contentious Business) Remuneration Order 1994