Beynon and Partners v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
Linked as:
Extract
Beynon and Partners v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
- British Telecommunications Plc v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
- Beynon and Partners v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
REFERS TO
- Moyna v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
- British Telecommunications Plc v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
CONSIDERS
- National Health Service (General Medical and Pharmaceutical Services) (Scotland) Amendment (No. 3) Regulations 1992
- Value Added Tax Act 1994 - Articles : SCH-9
- National Health Service Act 1977 - Articles : S-43
[See more]
RESUELVE RECURSO
APPLIES
CITES
COMMENTED in
CITED in
- Reliance Carpet Company Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation
- Brady King Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation
- Commissioner of Taxation v Secretary to the Department of Transport (Victoria)
[See more]
REFERRED in
- Honourable Society of Middle Temple v Revenue and Customs Commissioners
- The Commissioners for HM Revenue & Customs v Gray & Farrar International LLP
- Awendale Resources Incorporated v Pyxis Capital Management Ltd
[See more]
REPORTED OPINION OF in
CONSIDERED in
This document cites
- British Telecommunications Plc v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
- Beynon and Partners v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
- Beynon and Partners v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
- Moyna v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
- Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Madgett and Another (t/a Howden Court Hotel) (Joined Cases C-308/96 and C-94/97)