Bennett v Att Gen

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• Sagicor Gen Ins v Crawford Adjusters

CITES

• Nike Real Estate Ltd v De Bruyne

APPLIES

• Fitzpatrick Contractors Ltd v Tyco Fire & Integrated Solutions (UK) Ltd
• Kiam v MGN Ltd (No 2)

FOLLOWS

• Quayum v Hexagon Trust Company (CI) Ltd

NOT FOLLOWED in

• Att Gen v Barrett

CITED in

• Re DD Growth Premium Fund

CONSIDERED in

• Between (1) Frabran Holdings Company Ltd (2) Husky Trading Company Ltd Plaintiffs v Daventree Trustees Ltd Defendant; Between Kestrel Stock Trading Company Ltd Plaintiff v (1) Daventree Trustees Ltd and 10 Others Defendants; Between (1) Frabran Holdings Company Ltd and 12 Others Plaintiffs v Daventree Trustees Ltd Defendant
• Between (1) Frabran Holdings Company Ltd (2) Husky Trading Company Ltd Plaintiffs v Daventree Trustees Ltd Defendant; Between Kestrel Stock Trading Company Ltd Plaintiff v (1) Daventree Trustees Ltd and 10 Others Defendants; Between (1) Frabran Holdings Company Ltd and 12 Others Plaintiffs v Daventree Trustees Ltd Defendant
• Section 64 of the Companies Act (2022 Revision) and the Avivo Group

[See more]

• Section 64 of the Companies Act (2022 Revision) and the Avivo Group
• Proprietors Strata Plan #126 v Daniel Lowe
• Valley Health System v Augusta Healthcare, Inc.
• Between: Jian Ying Ourgame High Growth Investment Fund (in Official Liquidation) Plaintiff v (1) Xiong Hui (2) Zhang Jian (3) Powerful Warrior Ltd (4) Shi Kaiyi (5) Hu Jing (6) Yang Dongmei (7) Ourgame International Holdings Ltd Defendants; and in the matter between Jian Ying Ourgame High Growth Investment Fund (in Official Liquidation) Plaintiff v (1) Powerful Warrior Ltd (2) Shi Kaiyi (3) Hu Jing (4) Yang Dongmei Defendants
• William Helfrecht Plaintiff v James Chapman 1st Defendant Bodden Litigation Ltd 2nd Defendant Touch and Tetue Ltd 3rd Defendant
• The Companies Law (2012 Revision) and DD Growth Premium 2X Fund (in Official Liquidation) (‘the Company’)
• Lea Lilly Perry v Lopag Trust R
• China Branding Group Ltd (in Official Liquidation) Between:- Tony Bobulinski Appellant v China Branding Group Ltd (in Official Liquidation) Respondent
• In the Matter Section 46 of the Companies Act (2022 Revision) Between: (1) Koa Capital L.P. (2) 507 Summit LLC Plaintiffs v China Index Holdings Ltd Defendant
• Between: Abdulhameed Dhia Jafar Plaintiff v (1) Abraaj Holdings (in official liquidation) (2) GHF General Partner Ltd (in its capacity as general partner of GHF Fund LP (formerly Abraaj Growth Markets Health Fund LP) and GHF Fund (B) LP (formerly Abraaj Growth Markets Health Fund (B) LP)) (3) The GHF Group Ltd (formerly The Abraaj Healthcare Group Ltd) (4) Abraaj General Partner VIII Ltd (in its capacity as general partner of Neoma Private Equity Fund IV LP (formerly known as Abraaj Private Equity Fund IV LP)) Defendants
• William Helfrecht v James Chapman
• Abdulhameed Dhia Jafar v Abraaj Holdings
• The Companies Act (2022 Revision) and FGL Holdings
• CHINA BRANDING GROUP Ltd (in OFFICIAL LIQUIDATION) BETWEEN:- Tony Bobulinski Appellant v China Branding Group Ltd (in Official Liquidation) Respondent
• Ritchie Capital Management L.L.C. et Al v Lancelot Investors Fund, Ltd
• Fortunate Drift Ltd v Canterbury Securities, Ltd
• In the Matter Section 46 of the Companies Act (2022 Revision) Between: (1) Koa Capital L.P. (2) 507 Summit LLC Plaintiffs v China Index Holdings Ltd Defendant
• Zhongzhi Capital (HK) Company Ltd v Geopay Holding Ltd
• BDO Cayman Ltd v Ardent Harmony Fund Inc. (in Official Liquidation)
• The Companies Act (2022 Revision) and Virginia Solution SPC Ltd Between: Valley Health System Petitioner v Augusta Healthcare, Inc. Respondent
• Between 1) Cayman Islands Urgent Care Ltd 2) Kaiser Day Cannaceuticals Ltd 3) Kaiser Day Pharmaceuticals Ltd Applicants v 1) HM Director of Customs 2) Catherine O'Neil JP 3) Commissioner of RCIPS 4) The Chief Medical Officer Respondents

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 2010 1 CILR 478

This document cites

• Fitzpatrick Contractors Ltd v Tyco Fire & Integrated Solutions (UK) Ltd
• Kiam v MGN Ltd (No 2)
• Nike Real Estate Ltd v De Bruyne
• Sagicor Gen Ins v Crawford Adjusters
• Quayum v Hexagon Trust Company (CI) Ltd