Beckingham v Hodgens

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

REFERS TO

• Redwood Music Ltd v Chappell & Company Ltd

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• Neudorf (Darryl) v Network Expressions

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Beckingham v Hodgens

APPLIES

• Gillett v Holt
• Taylors Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Company Ltd (Note)

AFFIRMS

• Beckingham v Hodgens

CONSIDERS

• Levy v Rutley
• Copyright Act 1956 - Articles : S-11

DISTINGUISHES

• Godfrey v Lees
• Hadley v Kemp

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2002] EMLR 45
• [2004] ECDR 6

CONSIDERED in

• Barrett v Universal-Island Records Ltd
• Julia Kogan v Nicholas Martin
• Matthew Fisher v Gary Brooker and Another

[See more]

• Fisher v Brooker

FOLLOWED in

• Fisher v Brooker

This document cites

---

• Gillett v Holt
• Sir J. W. Ramsden, Bart. et Al v Dyson et Al
• Beckingham v Hodgens
• Hadley v Kemp
• Taylors Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Company Ltd (Note)



See all quotations

• Neudorf (Darryl) v Network Expressions
• Godfrey v Lees
• Redwood Music Ltd v Chappell & Company Ltd
• Levy v Rutley
• Copyright Act 1956