Barrett v. London Borough of Enfield, (1999) 243 N.R. 247 (HL)

This document cites

• Stovin et al. v. Norfolk County Council, (1996) 202 N.R. 290 (HL)
• P1 et al. v. Bedfordshire County Council, (1995) 185 N.R. 173 (HL)
• R. v. Sussex Police, (1998) 235 N.R. 101 (HL)
• Just v. British Columbia, (1989) 103 N.R. 1 (SCC)
• Page v. Smith, (1995) 182 N.R. 321 (HL)



See all quotations

• Hill Estate v. Chief Constable of West Yorkshire, (1988) 102 N.R. 241 (HL)
• R. v. Deputy Governor of Parkhurst Prison, Ex parte Hague, (1991) 141 N.R. 161 (HL)
• Caparo Industries v. Dickman et al., (1990) 108 N.R. 81 (HL)
• Phelps v London Borough of Hillingdon
• Stovin and Another v Norfolk County Council
• Page v Smith
• R v Chief Constable of Sussex, ex parte International Trader's Ferry Ltd (pet. all.)
• Carmarthenshire County Council v Lewis
• Barrett v Enfield London Borough Council
• Church of Jesus Christ Latter-Day Saints West Yorkshire Fire & Civil Defence John Munroe (Acrylics) Ltd London Fire & Civil Defence Authority & Others Digital Equipment Company Ltd Hampshire County Council Capital & Counties Hampshire County Council
• M and Another v London Borough of Newham and Others; X and Others v Bedfordshire County Council
• Dorset Yacht Company Ltd v Home Office
• R v Deputy Governor of Parkhurst Prison and Others, ex parte Hague ; Weldon v Home Office
• Van Oppen v Clerk to the Bedford Charity Trustees
• Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire
• Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
• Davis and another v Radcliffe and Others
• Gold v Essex County Council
• Yuen Kun Yeu v Attorney General of Hong Kong
• Osman v Ferguson
• Rowling v Takaro Properties Ltd
• A v Liverpool City Council
• Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee
• Lonrho Plc v Tebbit and Another
• Fisher v Ruislip-Northwood Urban District Council & Middlesex County Council
• Civil Procedure Rules 1998
• Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman