Barnett v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Linked as:
Extract
Barnett v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
- Miller-Mead v Minister of Housing and Local Government
- Slough Estates Ltd v Slough Borough Council (No. 2)
REFERS TO
- R v Slough Magistrates' Court ex parte Lindsay
- Miller-Mead v Minister of Housing and Local Government
- Wilson v West Sussex County Council
RESUELVE RECURSO
AFFIRMS
CONSIDERS
- R v Ashford Borough Council, ex parte Shepway District Council
- Town and Country Planning Act 1990 - Articles : S-288
CONSIDERED in
- The Queen (on the application of Lloyds Pharmacy Ltd) v Leeds City Council Manor Park Surgery (Interested Party)
- R Kemball v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (First Defendant)
- John Martin Baldwin Young (Claimant) Oxford City Council (Defendant) Oxford Brookes University (Interested Party)
[See more]
REFERRED in
- John Eric Greenwood Peiser v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government
- R Royston Potter v Amber Valley Borough Council Mr & Mrs Michael Wood (Interested Parties)
- Mikael Armstrong v Secretary of State for Levelling-Up, Housing and Communities
[See more]
CITED in
- The Queen (on the application of Gazelle Properties Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Bath and North East Somerset Council and Others (Interested Parties)
- Telford and Wrekin Council (Claimant) Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (Defendant) Growing Enterprises Ltd (Interested Party)
- Strongroom Ltd v London Borough of Hackney
[See more]
DISTINGUISHED in
REPORTED OPINION OF in
