Bambridge v Commissioners of Inland Revenue

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Congreve and Congreve v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
• Cooper v Cooper
• Meyappa Chetty v Supramanian Chetty

CONSIDERS

• Finance Act 1938 - Articles : S-28
• Income Tax Act 1952
• Finance Act 1936 - Articles : S-18

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Bambridge v Commissioners of Inland Revenue

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1955] UKHL J1208-1
• [1955] 1 WLR 1329
• [1955] 3 All ER 812

REFERRED in

• Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs v Fisher and another

CONSIDERED in

• Beulah Adeogun v Beulah Adeogun (Personal Representative of the Estate of Emily Pilgrim)
• Vestey v Commissioners of Inland Revenue (no 1)
• Vestey v Commissioners of Inland Revenue (no 1)

This document cites

• Congreve and Congreve v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
• Cooper v Cooper
• Meyappa Chetty v Supramanian Chetty
• Finance Act 1938
• Income Tax Act 1952



See all quotations

• Finance Act 1936
• Lord Dynevor estate: vesting estates in Glamorganshire in trustees for sale, with a power to make a partition Act 1837