Baldwin & Francis Ltd v Patents Appeal Tribunal

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• R v Northumberland Compensation Appeal Tribunal, ex parte Shaw
• D. S. Blaiber & Company, Ltd v Leopold Newborne (London)Ltd
• R v Board of Education

[See more]

• Mercer v Denne
• Southport Corporation v Esso Petroleum Company Ltd (Inverpool.)
• The Inhabitants of Trowbridge v Weston
• R v REGISTRAR of PONTYPRIDD COUNTY COURT, ex parte NATIONAL AMALGAMATED APPROVED SOCIETY (Boulton v National Coal Board. Phillips v Powell Duffryn, Ltd); R v REGISTRAR of ABERDARE and MOUNTAIN ASH COUNTY COURT, ex parte NATIONAL AMALGAMATED APPROVED SOCIETY (Bendle v National Coal Board. Williams v National Coal Board); R v REGISTRAR of TREDEGAR COUNTY COURT, ex parte NATIONAL AMALGAMATED APPROVED SOCIETY (Thomas v National Coal Board)
• R v Head
• R v Board of Education

REFERS TO

• Davies v Price
• R v Nat Bell Liquors Company Ltd
• King v Inhabitants of Utoxeter

[See more]

• Seereelall Jhuggroo v Central Arbitration & Control Board
• Mills against Wilkins
• R v Liverpool Justices. ex parte W
• Beames, an Infant, v Farley
• The King against Harman and Others
• R v De Rutzen
• R v The Justices of Surrey
• R v London County Council, ex parte London and Provincial Electric Theatres Ltd
• The King against John Liston
• Southport Corporation v Esso Petroleum Company Ltd (Inverpool.)
• The Parish of St, Clements against The Parish of St. Andrew, Holborn
• The King against Bass
• Champsey Bhara & Company v Jivraj Balloo Spinning and Weaving Company
• R v Manchester Legal Aid Committee. ex parte R A. Brand & Company Ltd
• R v Fulham, Hammersmith and Kensington Rent Tribunal. ex parte Hierowski
• The King against The Justices of Cambridgeshire
• The Queen against The Manchester and Leeds Railway Company
• Between the Parish of Ryslip and Hendon
• The King v The Inhabitants of Upton Gray
• Blaiber & Company Ltd v Leopold Newborne (London) Ltd
• R v Head
• Landauer v Asser
• The King v Albert Alverston
• Mercer v Denne
• The King v Northumberland Compensation Appeal Tribunal ex parte Shaw
• Board of Education v Rice and Others
• Overseers of the Township of the Foreign of Walsall and Others v The London and North-Western Railway Company

CONSIDERS

• Tribunals and Inquiries Act 1958 - Articles : S-9
• Patents Act 1949 - Articles : S-9
• Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act 1925 - Articles : S-98

[See more]

• Patents Act 1949 - Articles : S-14
• Tribunals and Inquiries Act 1958 - Articles : S-12
• Patents Act 1949
• Employment Act 2002
• R v Medical Appeal Tribunal, ex parte Gilmore ; Re Gilmore's Application

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Baldwin & Francis Ltd v Patents Appeal Tribunal

AFFIRMS

• Baldwin & Francis Ltd v Patents Appeal Tribunal

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1959] UKHL J0514-1
• [1959] 2 All ER 433
• [1959] 2 All ER 433

[See more]

• [1959] 2 WLR 826
• [1959] AC 663

CITED in

• Prentice v Cummins (No 5)
• Burns & Grint (SSAT Appeal)
• F Hoffman La Roche & Company Aktiengesellschaft v S P Musson Son & Company Ltd

[See more]

• Re Clarke
• Macadeen Ameerally and Aubrey Bentham v Attorney General DPP and Magistrate Prem Persaud

FOLLOWED in

• R v Patents Appeal Tribunal, ex parte Swift & Company
• Kam Gin Paik and Others v Pemungut Hasil Tanah Daerah Barat Daya, Pulau Pinang
• Chu Kim Sing and Another v Abd Razak Amin

[See more]

• Oriental Rubber and Oil Palms Sdn Bhd v Pemungut Hasil Tanah, Kuantan

CONSIDERED in

• R v Patents Appeal Tribunal, ex parte J. R Geigy S.A.
• Wrigley v Holland
• HCCC v Abou Hatoum and Another

[See more]

• David Anthony Perkins v Victorian Bar Inc. and Legal Professional Tribunal
• FPM Constructions Pty Ltd and Another v Australian Recreation Systems Pty Ltd and Another
• Prasad v Workers Compensation Commission
• Malek Fahd Islamic School Ltd v Minister for Education and Early Childhood Learning
• Midcoast Lime Company Pty Ltd v Minister for Primary Industries
• Ahern v Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd
• D’amore v Independent Commission Against Corruption
• R (Woolas) v Parliamentary Election Court for Oldham East and Saddleworth
• R v Henry Barber Tran Silver Tsoukatos Kyroglou Jenkins
• Re Clarke

REFERRED in

• Musa bin Keran v Public Service Commission Malaysia
• United Malayan Realty Sdn Bhd v Kanawagi Seperumaniam & Other Appealsalbilt kareem
• Tapah bin Bangkol v Superintendant of Land and Surveys

[See more]

• Latheefa Beebi Koya v Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia
• Government of Malaysia and Another v Jagdis Singh
• Lennox Linton Claimant v Maureen Hyman "Chief Magistrate Ag., District "A", St John's Attorney General (Antigua and Barbuda) Defendants [ECSC]

This document cites

---

• Baldwin & Francis Ltd v Patents Appeal Tribunal
• R v Head
• The King v Northumberland Compensation Appeal Tribunal ex parte Shaw
• Blaiber & Company Ltd v Leopold Newborne (London) Ltd
• Davies v Price



See all quotations

• Overseers of the Township of the Foreign of Walsall and Others v The London and North-Western Railway Company
• Board of Education v Rice and Others
• Southport Corporation v Esso Petroleum Company Ltd (Inverpool.)
• R v Medical Appeal Tribunal, ex parte Gilmore ; Re Gilmore's Application
• Mercer v Denne
• R v Board of Education
• King v Inhabitants of Utoxeter
• R v Northumberland Compensation Appeal Tribunal, ex parte Shaw
• Lim Yak Hua v Eastern & Oriental Hotel
• R v REGISTRAR of PONTYPRIDD COUNTY COURT, ex parte NATIONAL AMALGAMATED APPROVED SOCIETY (Boulton v National Coal Board. Phillips v Powell Duffryn, Ltd); R v REGISTRAR of ABERDARE and MOUNTAIN ASH COUNTY COURT, ex parte NATIONAL AMALGAMATED APPROVED SOCIETY (Bendle v National Coal Board. Williams v National Coal Board); R v REGISTRAR of TREDEGAR COUNTY COURT, ex parte NATIONAL AMALGAMATED APPROVED SOCIETY (Thomas v National Coal Board)
• R v Head
• R v The Justices of Surrey
• R v Manchester Legal Aid Committee. ex parte R A. Brand & Company Ltd
• The King against John Liston
• Landauer v Asser
• The Queen against The Manchester and Leeds Railway Company
• The King v Albert Alverston
• The King against Bass
• The King against The Justices of Cambridgeshire
• R v Fulham, Hammersmith and Kensington Rent Tribunal. ex parte Hierowski
• Mills against Wilkins
• R v Board of Education
• R v Liverpool Justices. ex parte W
• Between the Parish of Ryslip and Hendon
• The King v The Inhabitants of Upton Gray
• The Inhabitants of Trowbridge v Weston
• Mercer v Denne
• D. S. Blaiber & Company, Ltd v Leopold Newborne (London)Ltd
• Beames, an Infant, v Farley
• Southport Corporation v Esso Petroleum Company Ltd (Inverpool.)