Bahta (R) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Afectaciones

CONSIDERA CASO

• R (ZO (Somalia)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Bahta (R) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

CITA

• R (Scott) v London Borough of Hackney
• R (Boxall) v Waltham Forest LBC
• Walker v Walker and Another

[ver más]

• R v Liverpool City Council, ex parte Newman and Others
• R (Jones) v Nottingham City Council
• Martin Coyne and Another v DRC Distribution Ltd and Another
• RS (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Mendes and Another) v Southwark London Borough Council
• R (E) v JFS Governing Body
• R (ZO (Somalia)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

REVIERTE

• Bahta (R) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

CONSIDERADA por

• Rust Consulting v PB
• R Kr v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• VA, SB, DH, RM, EN and DR (by their litigation friend the Official Solicitor) and Another v Hertfordshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust and Others (Respondents and Interested Parties)

[ver más]

• Peace Emezie v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Cline (r on the application o) v North Yorskhire Police Authority and Others
• R Salih v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Kevin Sutton (by His Litigation Friend the Official Solicitor) v Calderdale Council
• R John Broom v The Secretary of State for Justice
• R Akunjee v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Darwins College Ltd v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Joanne Harripaul v London Borough of Lewisham
• R AO and AM v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Janet Adams v The Commission for Local Administration in England The London Borough of Lambeth (Interested Party) The Public Law Project (Intervener)
• R (on the application of Soreefan and Others) v Home Secretary
• Tshuma and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• An (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R AA v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The Queen (on the application of YZ (China)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Bushara v Secretary of State for Home Department
• Al (Albania) and Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The King (on the application of City Portfolio Ltd) v Lancaster City Council
• Between: CTMH Holdings Ltd Applicant v The Government of the Cayman Islands Respondent (1) Narayana Hrudayalaya Private Ltd (2) Aster Caribbean Holdings Ltd Interested Parties
• Friar Tuck Ltd and Quiver Inc. v International Tax Authority
• R (L and Others) v Croydon London Borough Council
• Between R National Conservation Council Applicant v The Central Planning Authority Respondent and Cayman Property Investments Ltd Interested Party
• AB (Sudan) (Appellant/Claimant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Sasha Lord v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
• City of Wolverhampton Council v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Between: CTMH Holdings Ltd Applicant v The Government of the Cayman Islands Respondent (1) Narayana Hrudayalaya Private Ltd (2) Aster Caribbean Holdings Ltd Interested Parties
• Friar Tuck Ltd v International Tax Authority
• Semere Tesfay and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Between: R National Conservation Council Applicant v The Central Planning Authority Respondent and Cayman Property Investments Ltd Interested Party
• Mostafa Shahi v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R AM (a child by his litigation friend OA) (1) and OA (2) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (M) v Croydon London Borough Council

CITADA NEUTRALMENTE por

• R FM (Afghanistan) and Others v SSHD
• R Alan John Williams v The Legal Ombudsman T. L. J. Law Ltd (Interested Party)
• Tshuma and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department

[ver más]

• R (on the application of Ben Hoare Bell Solicitors) v Lord Chancellor
• R Golchin v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• John J Rice & Company, Solicitors’ Application
• Family Planning Association’s Application
• Siuksteris (Arturas)’s Application (In the matter of an application by Arturas Siuksteris for judicial review and in the matter of a decision of the Northern Ireland Prison Service made on 7 November 2012)
• ZN (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

REFERIDA por

• R Dawit Abraha v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Iffat Naureen and Another v Salford City Council
• R Chung v The Secretary of State for Transport

[ver más]

• Miroslav Czach and Another v Poland
• R Gopikrishna v The Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education and Others (Interested Parties)
• Sasha Lord v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
• City of Wolverhampton Council v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (on the application of Gourlay) v Parole Board

DISTINGUIDA por

• R Poomah and Others v SSHD
• Ersus v London Borough of Redbridge

REPORTED OPINION OF por

• [2011] ACD 116

Documentos citados

• R (Mendes and Another) v Southwark London Borough Council
• Martin Coyne and Another v DRC Distribution Ltd and Another
• R (ZO (Somalia)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Jones) v Nottingham City Council
• R (Scott) v London Borough of Hackney



Ver todas las citas

• RS (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Walker v Walker and Another
• Bahta (R) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R v Liverpool City Council, ex parte Newman and Others
• R (Boxall) v Waltham Forest LBC
• R (ZO (Somalia)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (E) v JFS Governing Body
• Council Directive 2003/9/EC of 27 January 2003 laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers