Lim Tjoen Kong v A-B Chew Investments Pte Ltd

Core Citations

RESUELVE RECURSO

• A-B Chew Investments Pte Ltd v Lim Tjoen Kong

DISTINGUISHES

• Rush & Tompkins Ltd v Greater London Council
• Sobell v Boston
• Alan (W. J.) & Company Ltd v El Nasr Export and Import Company

[See more]

• Rush & Tompkins Ltd v Greater London Council

REFERS TO

• Walker v Wilsher

FOLLOWS

• Walker v Wilsher
• La Roche v Armstrong

AFFIRMS

• A-B Chew Investments Pte Ltd v Lim Tjoen Kong

FOLLOWED in

• Australian Food Corporation Pte Ltd and Another; Yeo Hiap Seng

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1991] SGCA 19
• [1991] SLR 188

REFERRED in

• Panjacharam Raveentheran and Another v Mookka Pillai Rajagopal and Others
• Law Society of Singapore v Tan Guat Neo Phyllis
• Mariwu Industrial Co (S) Pte Ltd v Dextra Asia Co Ltd and Another

CITED in

• Krishna Kumaran s/o K Ramakrishnan v Kuppusamy s/o Ramakrishnan

This document cites

• Alan (W. J.) & Company Ltd v El Nasr Export and Import Company
• Rush & Tompkins Ltd v Greater London Council
• Rush & Tompkins Ltd v Greater London Council
• Walker v Wilsher
• Walker v Wilsher



See all quotations

• La Roche v Armstrong
• Sobell v Boston
• A-B Chew Investments Pte Ltd v Lim Tjoen Kong
• Evidence Act 1893