Avoiding the appearance of impropriety: Missouri and Kansas Supreme Court decisions on the constitutionality of caps on noneconomic damages demonstrate the need for objective procedures in the selection of special judges.
›
Linked as:Summary
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Extract
Avoiding the appearance of impropriety: Missouri and Kansas Supreme Court decisions on the constitutionality of caps on noneconomic damages demonstrate the need for objective procedures in the selection of special judges.
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
This document cites
- Federal Cases - 710 F.3d 249 (5th Cir. 2013), 09-60651, Learmonth v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
- Arkansas - 842 S.W.2d 428 (Ark. 1992), 89-89, Medlock v. Leathers
- Kansas - 789 P.2d 541 (Kan. 1990), 62983, Samsel v. Wheeler Transport Services, Inc.
- Kansas - 120 P.3d 306 (Kan. 2005), 92,032, Montoy v. State
- Kansas - 289 P.3d 1098 (Kan. 2012), 99,818, Miller v. Johnson
