Australian Film Commission v Mabey

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• Chittick v Ackland

REFERS TO

• Federal Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Clarke & Kann
• Cadbury-Fry-Pascall Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation
• Australian Broadcasting Commission v Industrial Court (Sa)

CONSIDERS

• Collector of Customs (New South Wales) v Brian Lawlor Automotive Pty Ltd

CITES

• King v The Queen

FOLLOWS

• Australian National University v Burns

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1985] FCA 121
• 6 FCR 107
• 57 ALR 583

REFERRED in

• Nguyen v Minister for Health and Ageing

CONSIDERED in

• Griffith University v Tang

This document cites

• Collector of Customs (New South Wales) v Brian Lawlor Automotive Pty Ltd
• Australian National University v Burns
• Chittick v Ackland
• Federal Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Clarke & Kann
• King v The Queen



See all quotations

• Australian Broadcasting Commission v Industrial Court (Sa)
• Cadbury-Fry-Pascall Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation