Attorney General v Lopinot Limestone Ltd

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Town Police Clauses Act 1847
• Crown Proceedings Act 1947 - Articles : S-17
• Royal Exchange Assurance Corporation v Sjoforsakrings Aktiebolaget Vega

[See more]

• Banbury v Bank of Montreal
• R v Port of London Authority, ex parte Kynoch Ltd
• Birkdale District Electric Supply Company v Southport Corporation
• R v Hendon Rural District Council, ex parte Chorley
• R v Minister of Health
• R v Medical Appeal Tribunal, ex parte Gilmore ; Re Gilmore's Application
• Taylor v National Coal Board
• Perkowski (Ewa) v Wellington Corporation
• Pyx Grainite Company Ltd v Ministry of Housing and Local Government
• Edwick v Sunbury-on-Thames Urban District Council
• R v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, ex parte Lain
• James v Minister of Housing and Local Government
• Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission
• R v Liverpool Corpn.ex parte Liverpool Taxi Fleet Operators' Association
• Attorney General v Ryan
• Newbury District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment
• Thomas (Endell) v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
• Attorney General of Hong-Kong v Ng Yuen Shiu
• Pennine Raceway Ltd v Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council

CITES

• London Passenger Transport Board v Moscrop
• Pyx Grainite Company Ltd v Ministry of Housing and Local Government
• Taylor v National Coal Board

[See more]

• Thomas v Attorney-General
• Belvoir Finance Company Ltd v Harold G. Cole & Company Ltd
• Owners of the "Tasmania" v Owners of the "City of Corinth"
• Pennine Raceway Ltd v Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council
• Ramberran v Mohammed
• Hanily v Minister of Local Government and Planning
• Wilover Nominees Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
• Wilover Nominees Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
• Francis v Chief of Police
• Smith and Another v L J Williams Ltd
• British Oxygen Company Ltd v Board of Trade
• R v Governor of Brixton Prison, ex parte Soblen
• Ridge v Baldwin
• Birkdale District Electric Supply Company v Southport Corporation
• Schmidt v Home Office ; Schmidt v Secretary of State for Home Affairs
• Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission
• James v Minister of Housing and Local Government

CONSIDERED in

• Mitchell v The Commissioner of Police et Al
• R v Attorney General ex parte Jamaican Bar Association
• Broadgate Place Property Company Ltd v Minister of Planning Economic and Social Restructuring and Gender Affairs

[See more]

• Z. G.; A. B. v The Minister of Natonal Security; G. M. v The Minister of Natonal Security

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• (1983) 34 WIR 299

DISTINGUISHED in

• Albert Deterville Applicant v 1. Wilbert King 2. Egbert Andrew 3. Jacques Compton 4. Attorney General Respondents [ECSC]

This document cites

• Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission
• Schmidt v Home Office ; Schmidt v Secretary of State for Home Affairs
• British Oxygen Company Ltd v Board of Trade
• Taylor v National Coal Board
• James v Minister of Housing and Local Government



See all quotations

• Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission
• R v Liverpool Corpn.ex parte Liverpool Taxi Fleet Operators' Association
• Wilover Nominees Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
• Newbury District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment
• R v Governor of Brixton Prison, ex parte Soblen
• R v Medical Appeal Tribunal, ex parte Gilmore ; Re Gilmore's Application
• Pennine Raceway Ltd v Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council
• Pyx Grainite Company Ltd v Ministry of Housing and Local Government
• Birkdale District Electric Supply Company v Southport Corporation
• London Passenger Transport Board v Moscrop
• James v Minister of Housing and Local Government
• Pyx Grainite Company Ltd v Ministry of Housing and Local Government
• R v Port of London Authority, ex parte Kynoch Ltd
• R v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, ex parte Lain
• Birkdale District Electric Supply Company v Southport Corporation
• Thomas (Endell) v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
• Francis v Chief of Police
• Pennine Raceway Ltd v Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council
• Attorney General v Ryan
• R v Hendon Rural District Council, ex parte Chorley
• Wilover Nominees Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
• Royal Exchange Assurance Corporation v Sjoforsakrings Aktiebolaget Vega
• Edwick v Sunbury-on-Thames Urban District Council
• Attorney General of Hong-Kong v Ng Yuen Shiu
• Perkowski (Ewa) v Wellington Corporation
• Ridge v Baldwin
• Belvoir Finance Company Ltd v Harold G. Cole & Company Ltd
• Owners of the "Tasmania" v Owners of the "City of Corinth"
• Thomas v Attorney-General
• Ramberran v Mohammed