Attorney General v Crayford Urban District Council

Afectaciones

---

REFIERE

• Osborne v Amalgamated Society of Railway Servants
• Shelley v London County Council. Harcourt v London County Council
• Attorney General v Smethwick Corporation

[ver más]

• Belcher v Reading Corporation
• Ashbury Railway Carriage and Iron Company Ltd v Riche (in Error)

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Attorney General v Crayford Urban District Council

APLICA

• Peel v London and North Western Railway Company

CITA

• Shelley v London County Council. Harcourt v London County Council

CONSIDERA

• Housing Act 1957 - Artículos : S-111
• Housing Act 1957
• Employment Rights Act 1996

CITADA NEUTRALMENTE por

• Attorney-General (Q) (Ex Rel Duncan) v Andrews
• Rochdale Borough Council v Dixon

CONSIDERADA por

• The Queen v The London Borough of Ealing and Another
• Risk Management Partners Ltd v Brent London Borough Council (No 1)
• Truth About Motorways Pty Ltd v Macquarie Infrastructure Investment Management Ltd

[ver más]

• R v Greater Belfast Coroner ex parte Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission

REPORTED OPINION OF por

• [1962] 1 Lloyd's Rep 163
• [1962] 2 All ER 147
• 60 LGR 261

[ver más]

• [1962] 126 JP 308
• [1962] 2 WLR 998
• [1962] CH 575

REFERIDA por

• The Queen (on the application of [Kalonga]) v London Borough of Croydon

APLICADA por

• Sovmots Investments Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment; Brompton Securities Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment

Documentos citados

---

• Shelley v London County Council. Harcourt v London County Council
• Ashbury Railway Carriage and Iron Company Ltd v Riche (in Error)
• Shelley v London County Council. Harcourt v London County Council
• Peel v London and North Western Railway Company
• Attorney General v Smethwick Corporation



Ver todas las citas

• Belcher v Reading Corporation
• Osborne v Amalgamated Society of Railway Servants
• Employment Rights Act 1996
• Housing Act 1957