Attorney General v Arthur and Four Others

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• DPP for Northern Ireland v Lynch
• R v Sheppard
• R v Churchill (No 2)

[See more]

• Re H. P. C. Productions Ltd
• Hardcastle v Bielby
• Johnson v Youden
• Lim Chin Aik v The Queen
• Re Maidstone Buildings Provisions Ltd
• John Arthur Charles Gould
• De Gruchy v Housing Committee

CITES

• R v Holbrook

APPLIES

• Gammon (Hong Kong) Ltd v Attorney General of Hong Kong; Yee Chin Teo v Attorney General of Hong Kong; Chak Shing Mak v Attorney General of Hong Kong

FOLLOWS

• Sweet v Parsley

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1990] JLR 11

This document cites

• R v Churchill (No 2)
• John Arthur Charles Gould
• Miliangos v George Frank (Textiles) Ltd
• DPP for Northern Ireland v Lynch
• R v Churchill (No 2)



See all quotations

• Browne v Dunn
• R v Sheppard
• R v Sheppard
• Sweet v Parsley
• Johnson v Youden
• Hardcastle v Bielby
• Lim Chin Aik v The Queen
• Attorney General v Weston
• De Gruchy v Housing Committee
• R v Holbrook
• Sherras v De Rutzen
• Somerset v Wade
• Re H. P. C. Productions Ltd
• Re Maidstone Buildings Provisions Ltd
• Gammon (Hong Kong) Ltd v Attorney General of Hong Kong; Yee Chin Teo v Attorney General of Hong Kong; Chak Shing Mak v Attorney General of Hong Kong