Attorney General of Alberta v Attorney General of Canada

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• British North America Act 1867 - Articles : S-91
• British North America Act 1867 - Articles : S-92

CITES

• Bank of Toronto v Lambe; Merchants' Bank of Canada v Lambe ; Canadian Bank of Commerce v Lambe; North British Mercantile Insurance Company v Lambe
• John Deere Plow Company v Wharton
• The Great West Saddlery Company Ltd v The King Attorney-General of Canada (Intervener) the John Deere Plow Company Ltd v The King Attorney-General of Canada (Intervener) the A. Macdonald Company Ltd v Harmer Attorney-General of Canada (Intervener) the Great West Saddlery Company Ltd v Davidson Attorney-General of Canada (Intervener) the Harris Lithographing Company Ltd v Currie Attorney-General of Canada (Intervener) the Harris Lithographing Company Ltd v Attorney-General of Ontario Attorney-General of Canada (Intervener)

[See more]

• Russell v R
• Forbes v Attorney General for Manitoba
• Attorney General for Ontario v Attorney General for the Dominion
• Union Colliery Company of British Columbia v Bryden
• Attorney-General for Ontario v Reciprocal Insurers Having No Licences Under The Dominion Insurance Act, The Canadian Fire Underwriters' Association, and The Attorney-General of Canada; and Connected Appeals
• Re Insurance Act of Canada

CONSIDERED in

• Moran (W. R) Proprietary Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation for New South Wales. Attorney General for New South Wales and Others, Interveners
• Victoria v Commonwealth

CITED in

• R v Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration; ex parte Victoria Victoria v Commonwealth
• Stenhouse v Coleman
• Sgh Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation

[See more]

• Attorney General for Canada v Attorney General for the Province of Quebec and Attorneys-General for Saskatchewan, Alberta and Manitoba
• New South Wales v Commonwealth
• Thomas v Mowbray and Ors
• Imperial Tobacco Limited V. The Lord Advocate As Representing The Scottish Ministers

REFERRED in

• Arthur Yates & Company Pty Ltd v Vegetable Seeds Committee

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 55 TLR 65
• [1939] AC 117

FOLLOWED in

• Phang Chin Hock v Public Prosecutor