[2013] NSWCCA 205

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• R v Gent
• R v Ilbay
• R v Tadrosse

[See more]

• R v Baker
• R v Harris
• [2002] NSWCCA 491
• Application by Attorney General under Section 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act for a Guideline Judgment Concerning the Offence of High Range Prescribed Concentration of Alcohol Under Section 9(4) of the Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Act 1999 (No. 3 of 2002)
• Hristovksi v R
• Green v The Queen
• R v Najem
• Mulato v R
• Ryan v R
• R v Howard
• R v AZ
• R v Kennedy
• Postiglione v R
• Pearce v R
• Jamie Joseph Cooper v R
• Gebara v R

REPORTS OPINION

• Athos v R

CONSIDERED in

• Neil Harris (a pseudonym) v R
• Mario Antonio Laspina(Applicant) v R
• Veith v R

[See more]

• Elomar v R; Elomar v R
• Tuyet Lam v Crown
• Wornes v R

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2013] NSWCCA 205
• [2013] NSWCCA 205

This document cites

• R v Gent
• Mulato v R
• R v Baker
• Application by Attorney General under Section 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act for a Guideline Judgment Concerning the Offence of High Range Prescribed Concentration of Alcohol Under Section 9(4) of the Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Act 1999 (No. 3 of 2002)
• R v Howard



See all quotations

• R v Tadrosse
• Green v The Queen
• Ryan v R
• R v Najem
• Jamie Joseph Cooper v R
• Hristovksi v R
• R v AZ
• Gebara v R
• R v Harris
• R v Ilbay
• R v Kennedy
• Postiglione v R
• Pearce v R
• R v Olbrich