Julian Assange v Swedish Prosecution Authority
Linked as:
Extract
Julian Assange v Swedish Prosecution Authority
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
- Litster v Forth Dry Dock and Engineering Company Ltd
- R v Governor of Brixton Prison, ex parte Caborn-Waterfield
- Dabas v High Court of Justice in Madrid, Spain
[See more]
REFERS TO
CONSIDERS
- European Communities Act 1972
- Employment Act 2002 - Articles : S-2
- European Union (Amendment) Act 2008
[See more]
RESUELVE RECURSO
CITES
- Pickstone v Freemans Plc
- R v Lyons ; R v Parnes ; R v Ronson ; R v Saunders (No 3)
- Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza
[See more]
COMMENTS
REVERSES
CONSIDERED in
- Kemen Uranga Artola v The 6th Section of the National High Court of Madrid, Spain
- (1) Ministry of Justice, Lithuania (Appellants) Mindaugas Bucnys (Respondents) Marius Sakalis (Appellants) (2) Ministry of Justice, Republic of Lithuania (Respondents) (3) Dimitri Lavrov (Appellants) Ministry of Justice, Republic of Estonia (Respondents)
- Gabor Agardi v Penitentiary Judge of the Metropolitan Court, Budapest, Hungary
[See more]
REFERRED in
- District Court in Zamosc Second Penal Division Poland v Mariusz Kudyk
- Piotr Tadeusz Korcala v Polish Judicial Authority
- Sokolovs v Office of the Public Prosecutor General (latvia)
[See more]
CITED in
- Dean Dixon v Kingdom of Spain
- R (Sandiford) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs
- Krupeckiene v Public Prosecutor's Office Lithuania
[See more]
APPLIED in
- Rafal Romanski Appellant v District Law Court in Tarnobrzeg, Poland Respondent
- Crown Prosecution Service and another v Gohil and another
DISTINGUISHED in
FOLLOWED in
REPORTED OPINION OF in
This document cites