Armstrong v Times Newspapers Ltd

Afectacións

CONSIDERA CASO

• Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd
• GKR Karate (UK) Ltd v Yorkshire Post Newspapers Ltd (No 2)

[ver máis]

• Bonnick v Morris
• Turkington and Others (Practising as McCartan Turkington Breen) v Times Newspapers Ltd
• Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd
• Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd (No. 2)
• Jameel and another v Wall Street Journal Europe
• Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd (No. 2)
• R v Johnson (Harold)
• Grobbelaar v News Group Newspapers Ltd

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Armstrong v Times Newspapers Ltd

CONSIDERA

• Defamation Act 1952 - Artigos : S-5
• Civil Evidence Act 1995

REPORTED OPINION OF por

• [2005] EMLR 797

CONSIDERADA por

• Gordon Bowker (trading as Lagopus Services) and Another v The Royal Society for The Protection of Birds
• Keith Crossland v University of Glamorgan
• Lee Anthony Freer v (1) Mr Aurang Zeb (2) Person unknown aka “Boo” (3) Claire Marie McBride

[ver máis]

• Dee v Telegraph Media Ltd

REFERIDA por

• Careif Ltd and Another v Jamaica Observer Ltd

Documentos citados

• Grobbelaar v News Group Newspapers Ltd
• Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd (No. 2)
• Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd
• Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd
• Turkington and Others (Practising as McCartan Turkington Breen) v Times Newspapers Ltd



Ver todas as citas

• Jameel and another v Wall Street Journal Europe
• Lance Armstrong v 1. Times Newspapers Ltd and Others
• Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd (No. 2)
• Bonnick v Morris
• Three Rivers District Council v Governor and Company of the Bank of England (No. 3)
• R v Johnson (Harold)
• GKR Karate (UK) Ltd v Yorkshire Post Newspapers Ltd (No 2)
• Civil Evidence Act 1995
• Defamation Act 1952