Arcelormittal Tubular Products Roman S.A. et al. v. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd., 2013 ABQB 578

This document cites

• Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. v. Arcelormittal Tubular Products Roman S.A. et al., 2012 ABQB 679
• Pootlass v. Pootlass, (1999) 5 B.C.T.C. 21 (SC)
• Edmonton (City) v. Lovat Tunnel Equipment Inc. et al., (2000) 257 A.R. 343 (QB)
• Dickhoff v. Armadale Communications Ltd. et al., (1993) 113 Sask.R. 285 (CA)
• Divestco Inc. v. Devon Energy Corp. et al., (2011) 530 A.R. 133 (QBM)



See all quotations

• Chohan v. Cadsky et al., 2009 ABCA 334
• Neuschaefer v. Leskiw et al., (2008) 435 A.R. 350 (QB)
• McIvor v. Manitoba Keewatinowi Okimakanak Inc., 2005 MBQB 214
• Malhab v. Diffusion Métromédia CMR inc. et al., (2011) 412 N.R. 1 (SCC)
• Madill v. Alexander Consulting Group Ltd. et al., (1999) 237 A.R. 307 (CA)
• Dow Chemical Canada Inc. v. Nova Chemicals Corporation, (2010) 495 A.R. 338 (QB)
• Stolk v. 382779 Alta. Inc., 2005 ABQB 440
• Walker and Walker Brothers Quarries Ltd. v. CFTO Ltd. et al., (1987) 19 O.A.C. 10 (CA)
• C.H.S. v. Alberta (Director of Child Welfare), (2006) 403 A.R. 103 (QB)
• Duke et al. v. Puts, (1997) 161 Sask.R. 299 (QB)
• Lougheed v. Canadian Broadcasting Corp., (1978) 11 A.R. 55 (TD)
• Cooper et al. v. Hennan et al., 2005 ABQB 709
• Grey Condominium Corp. No. 27 v. Blue Mountain Resorts Ltd. et al., 2008 ONCA 384
• Shinkaruk v. Jones and Russwood Broadcasting et al., (1985) 41 Sask.R. 187 (QB)
• C.H.S. et al. v. Director of Child Welfare (Alta.), (2006) 401 A.R. 215 (CA)
• Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. v. Arcelormittal Tubular Products Roman S.A. et al., (2013) 544 A.R. 24
• DeSoto Resources Ltd. v. EnCana Corp. et al., 2010 ABCA 110
• Regulation (EEC) No 227/75 of the Commission of 30 January 1975 altering components used to calculate the differential amounts for colza and rape seed
• Commission Regulation (EC) No 293/94 of 9 February 1994 fixing the export refunds on pigmeat
• Commission Regulation (EU) No 124/2010 of 11 February 2010 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
• Arizona - State v. Superior Court In and For County of Maricopa
• Federal Cases - Caudle v. Thomason
• Illinois - Weber v. Cueto
• Washington - Herron v. KING Broadcasting Co.
• New York - Luisi v. JWT Group, Inc.