Apt v Apt

Afectaciones

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Apt v Apt

REFIERE

• R v Millis
• Brooks v Brooks
• Hyde v Hyde and Woodmansee

[ver más]

• Wolfenden v Wolfenden
• Baindail (orse. Lawson) v Baindail
• Chatenay v Brazilian Submarine Telegraph Company
• Berthiaume v Dastous
• R v Hammersmith Superintendent Registrar of Marriages
• Nachimson v Nachimson
• Fender v St. John-Mildmay
• Aksionairnoye Obschestvo A. M. Luther v Sagor & Company
• Sottomayer v De Barros (No. 2)
• Naylor, Benzon & Company v Krainische Industrie Gesellschaft
• Niboyet v Niboyet
• Oliver v Woodroffe

AFIRMA

• Apt v Apt

REPORTED OPINION OF por

• [1947] 2 All ER 677
• 63 TLR 618
• [1948] P 83

APLICADA por

• Ponticelli v Ponticelli

CITADA NEUTRALMENTE por

• A v K

REFERIDA por

• Lepre v Lepre
• Albert Awuku v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Westminster City Council v C and Others

CONSIDERADA por

• CB (Validity of marriage: proxy marriage)
• Hamza v Minister for Justice