Application by Shelden Patrick Vaughan pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW)

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Human Rights Act 1998

CONSIDERS

• Vaughan v R
• Eastman v DPP (Act)
• Application of Peter James Holland under s.78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001

[See more]

• R v Suey
• Appn of Robert Joseph Dunn
• Frank Sinkovich v The Honourable Justice Megan Latham
• Richard William Buttrose v Attorney General of New South Wales
• R v Hemsley
• DPP (Cth) v De La Rosa
• R v Chapman
• Brenda Lee Haines v R
• Stephen Shine(Applicant) v Crown
• Robinson v R
• The Queen v Mark Andrew Verdins
• The Queen v Guode
• Mabo v State of Queensland (No2)
• Joshua Jack Clarke
• Azzopardi v R
• R v Thomson; R v Houlton
• Kidd v R
• Elyard v R
• Green v The Queen
• Lowe v R

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2022] NSWSC 920

CONSIDERED in

• Application by Shelden Vaughan pursuant to s 78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) (No 2)
• Application by Paul Scott Howes pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW)

This document cites

• R v Suey
• The Queen v Mark Andrew Verdins
• Eastman v DPP (Act)
• Stephen Shine(Applicant) v Crown
• Joshua Jack Clarke



See all quotations

• Green v The Queen
• R v Thomson; R v Houlton
• Richard William Buttrose v Attorney General of New South Wales
• Kidd v R
• Robinson v R
• DPP (Cth) v De La Rosa
• Elyard v R
• Frank Sinkovich v The Honourable Justice Megan Latham
• Application of Peter James Holland under s.78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001
• Brenda Lee Haines v R
• R v Chapman
• Appn of Robert Joseph Dunn
• R v Hemsley
• Lowe v R
• Mabo v State of Queensland (No2)
• Azzopardi v R
• Vaughan v R
• The Queen v Guode
• Human Rights Act 1998